The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Different response to Plasmodium falciparum malaria in West African sympatric ethnic groups
Open accessAbstract
The comparison of malaria indicators among populations that have different genetic backgrounds and are uniformly exposed to the same parasite strains is one approach to the study of human heterogeneities in the response to the infection. We report the results of comparative surveys on three sympatric West African ethnic groups, Fulani, Mossi, and Rimaibé, living in the same conditions of hyperendemic transmission in a Sudan savanna area northeast of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. The Mossi and Rimaibé are Sudanese negroid populations with a long tradition of sedentary farming, while the Fulani are nomadic pastoralists, partly settled and characterized by non-negroid features of possible caucasoid origin. Parasitological, clinical, and immunological investigations showed consistent interethnic differences in Plasmodium falciparum infection rates, malaria morbidity, and prevalence and levels of antibodies to various P. falciparum antigens. The data point to a remarkably similar response to malaria in the Mossi and Rimaibé, while the Fulani are clearly less parasitized, less affected by the disease, and more responsive to all antigens tested. No difference in the use of malaria protective measures was demonstrated that could account for these findings, and sociocultural or environmental factors do not seem to be involved. Known genetic factors of resistance to malaria did not show higher frequencies in the Fulani. The differences in the immune response were not explained by the entomological observations, which indicated substantially uniform exposure to infective bites. The available data support the existence of unknown genetic factors, possibly related to humoral immune responses, determining interethnic differences in the susceptibility to malaria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The pathogenic basis of malaria
Miller, L. H., Baruch, D. I., Marsh, K., & Doumbo, O. K. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415673a · Cited by 1,746
Urbanization, malaria transmission and disease burden in Africa
Hay, S. I., Guerra, C. A., Tatem, A. J., Atkinson, P. M., & Snow, R. W. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1069 · Cited by 586
Genetics of susceptibitlity to human infectious disease
Cooke, G. S., & Hill, A. V. S. (2001) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35103577 · Cited by 444
Hay, S. I., Rogers, D. J., Toomer, J. F., & Snow, R. W. (2000) · Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.1016/s0035-9203(00)90246-3 · Cited by 312
SMITH, T., KILLEEN, G. F., MAIRE, N., ROSS, A., MOLINEAUX, L., TEDIOSI, F., HUTTON, G., UTZINGER, J., DIETZ, K., & TANNER, M. (2006) · The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2006.75.2_suppl.0750001 · Cited by 225
Metadata
- Authors
- Modiano, D., Petrarca, V., Sirima, B. S., Nebié, I., Diallo, D., Esposito, F., & Coluzzi, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1996-11-12
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 13206-13211
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2151597897
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Different response to Plasmodium falciparum malaria in West African sympatric ethnic groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.93.23.13206
- The paper
- Modiano, D., Petrarca, V., Sirima, B. S., Nebié, I., Diallo, D., Esposito, F., & Coluzzi, M. (1996). Different response to Plasmodium falciparum malaria in West African sympatric ethnic groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.23.13206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.