Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 423

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brain monoamine oxidase A inhibition in cigarette smokers

Open access
Fowler, Joanna S., Volkow, Nora D., Wang, Gene-Jack, Pappas, Naomi, Logan, Jean, Shea, Colleen, Alexoff, David, MacGregor, Robert R., Schlyer, David J., Zezulkova, Ivana, Wolf, Alfred P.·1996·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Several studies have documented a strong association between smoking and depression. Because cigarette smoke has been reported to inhibit monoamine oxidase (MAO) A in vitro and in animals and because MAO A inhibitors are effective antidepressants, we tested the hypothesis that MAO A would be reduced in the brain of cigarette smokers. We compared brain MAO A in 15 nonsmokers and 16 current smokers with [ 11 C]clorgyline and positron emission tomography (PET). Four of the nonsmokers were also treated with the antidepressant MAO inhibitor drug, tranylcypromine (10 mg/day for 3 days) after the baseline PET scan and then rescanned to assess the sensitivity of [ 11 C]clorgyline binding to MAO inhibition. MAO A levels were quantified by using the model term λk 3 which is a function of brain MAO A concentration. Smokers had significantly lower brain MAO A than nonsmokers in all brain regions examined (average reduction, 28%). The mean λ k 3 values for the whole brain were 0.18 ± 0.04 and 0.13 ± 0.03 cc brain (ml plasma ) −1 min −1 for nonsmokers and smokers, respectively; P < 0.0003). Tranylcypromine treatment reduced λ k 3 by an average of 58% for the different brain regions. Our results show that tobacco smoke exposure is associated with a marked reduction in brain MAO A, and this reduction is about half of that produced by a brief treatment with tranylcypromine. This suggests that MAO A inhibition needs to be considered as a potential contributing variable in the high rate of smoking in depression and in the development of more effective strategies for smoking cessation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.93.24.14065

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 423

Metadata

Authors
Fowler, J. S., Volkow, N. D., Wang, G.-J., Pappas, N., Logan, J., Shea, C., Alexoff, D., MacGregor, R. R., Schlyer, D. J., Zezulkova, I., & Wolf, A. P.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1996-11-26
Volume
93
Issue
24
Pages
14065-14069
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2153455171
Cited by
423
References
37
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brain monoamine oxidase A inhibition in cigarette smokers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.93.24.14065
The paper
Fowler, J. S., Volkow, N. D., Wang, G.-J., Pappas, N., Logan, J., Shea, C., Alexoff, D., MacGregor, R. R., Schlyer, D. J., Zezulkova, I., & Wolf, A. P. (1996). Brain monoamine oxidase A inhibition in cigarette smokers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.24.14065

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.