The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mercuric ion reduction and resistance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants expressing a modified bacterial merA gene.
Open accessAbstract
With global heavy metal contamination increasing, plants that can process heavy metals might provide efficient and ecologically sound approaches to sequestration and removal. Mercuric ion reductase, MerA, converts toxic Hg2+ to the less toxic, relatively inert metallic mercury (Hg0) The bacterial merA sequence is rich in CpG dinucleotides and has a highly skewed codon usage, both of which are particularly unfavorable to efficient expression in plants. We constructed a mutagenized merA sequence, merApe9, modifying the flanking region and 9% of the coding region and placing this sequence under control of plant regulatory elements. Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana seeds expressing merApe9 germinated, and these seedlings grew, flowered, and set seed on medium containing HgCl2 concentrations of 25-100 microM (5-20 ppm), levels toxic to several controls. Transgenic merApe9 seedlings evolved considerable amounts of Hg0 relative to control plants. The rate of mercury evolution and the level of resistance were proportional to the steady-state mRNA level, confirming that resistance was due to expression of the MerApe9 enzyme. Plants and bacteria expressing merApe9 were also resistant to toxic levels of Au3+. These and other data suggest that there are potentially viable molecular genetic approaches to the phytoremediation of metal ion pollution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantitative assessment of worldwide contamination of air, water and soils by trace metals
Nriagu, J. O., & Pacyna, J. M. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/333134a0 · Cited by 4,368
Moore, M. D., & Kaplan, S. (1992) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.174.5.1505-1514.1992 · Cited by 183
Cited by
Metals, minerals and microbes: geomicrobiology and bioremediation
Gadd, G. M. (2010) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.037143-0 · Cited by 2,013
A comparison of technologies for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils
Khalid, S., Shahid, M., Niazi, N. K., Murtaza, B., Bibi, I., & Dumat, C. (2017) · Journal of Geochemical Exploration · doi:10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.11.021 · Cited by 1,356
Phytoremediation of soil metals
Chaney, R. L., Malik, M., Li, Y. M., Brown, S. L., Brewer, E. P., Angle, J. S., & Baker, A. J. (1997) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0958-1669(97)80004-3 · Cited by 1,254
The biochemistry of environmental heavy metal uptake by plants: implications for the food chain.
Peralta-Videa, J. R., Lopez, M. L., Narayan, M., Saupe, G., & Gardea-Torresdey, J. (2009) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2009.03.005 · Cited by 926
Removal of heavy metals in contaminated soil by phytoremediation mechanism: a review
Awa, S. H., & Hadibarata, T. (2020) · Water, Air, & Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-020-4426-0 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Rugh, C. L., Wilde, H. D., Stack, N. M., Thompson, D. M., Summers, A. O., & Meagher, R. B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1996-04-16
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3182-3187
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2092893920
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mercuric ion reduction and resistance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants expressing a modified bacterial merA gene. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.93.8.3182
- The paper
- Rugh, C. L., Wilde, H. D., Stack, N. M., Thompson, D. M., Summers, A. O., & Meagher, R. B. (1996). Mercuric ion reduction and resistance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants expressing a modified bacterial merA gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.8.3182
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.