The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-validated maximum likelihood enhances crystallographic simulated annealing refinement
Open accessAbstract
Recently, the target function for crystallographic refinement has been improved through a maximum likelihood analysis, which makes proper allowance for the effects of data quality, model errors, and incompleteness. The maximum likelihood target reduces the significance of false local minima during the refinement process, but it does not completely eliminate them, necessitating the use of stochastic optimization methods such as simulated annealing for poor initial models. It is shown that the combination of maximum likelihood with cross-validation, which reduces overfitting, and simulated annealing by torsion angle molecular dynamics, which simplifies the conformational search problem, results in a major improvement of the radius of convergence of refinement and the accuracy of the refined structure. Torsion angle molecular dynamics and the maximum likelihood target function interact synergistically, the combination of both methods being significantly more powerful than each method individually. This is demonstrated in realistic test cases at two typical minimum Bragg spacings ( d min = 2.0 and 2.8 Å, respectively), illustrating the broad applicability of the combined method. In an application to the refinement of a new crystal structure, the combined method automatically corrected a mistraced loop in a poor initial model, moving the backbone by 4 Å.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A real-space refinement procedure for proteins
Diamond, R. (1971) · Acta Crystallographica Section A · doi:10.1107/s0567739471000986 · Cited by 236
Cited by
Crystallography & NMR System: A New Software Suite for Macromolecular Structure Determination
Brünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J. S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N. S., et al. (1998) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444998003254 · Cited by 15,715
Self-citationTowards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine
Afonine, P. V., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Echols, N., Headd, J. J., Moriarty, N. W., Mustyakimov, M., Terwilliger, T. C., Urzhumtsev, A., Zwart, P. H., & Adams, P. D. (2012) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444912001308 · Cited by 5,511
Self-citationShiau, A. K., Barstad, D., Loria, P. M., Cheng, L., Kushner, P. J., Agard, D. A., & Greene, G. L. (1998) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81717-1 · Cited by 2,729
Structural Mechanism for Rifampicin Inhibition of Bacterial RNA Polymerase
Campbell, E. A., Korzheva, N., Mustaev, A., Murakami, K., Nair, S., Goldfarb, A., & Darst, S. A. (2001) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00286-0 · Cited by 1,556
The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL–GroES–(ADP)7 chaperonin complex
Xu, Z., Horwich, A. L., & Sigler, P. B. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/41944 · Cited by 1,239
Metadata
- Authors
- Adams, P. D., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J., & Brünger, A. T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1997-05-13
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5018-5023
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2047173579
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-validated maximum likelihood enhances crystallographic simulated annealing refinement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.94.10.5018
- The paper
- Adams, P. D., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J., & Brünger, A. T. (1997). Cross-validated maximum likelihood enhances crystallographic simulated annealing refinement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.10.5018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.