The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The interaction of the general anesthetic etomidate with the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor is influenced by a single amino acid
Open accessAbstract
The γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA A ) receptor is a transmitter-gated ion channel mediating the majority of fast inhibitory synaptic transmission within the brain. The receptor is a pentameric assembly of subunits drawn from multiple classes (α 1–6 , β 1–3 , γ 1–3 , δ 1 , and ɛ 1 ). Positive allosteric modulation of GABA A receptor activity by general anesthetics represents one logical mechanism for central nervous system depression. The ability of the intravenous general anesthetic etomidate to modulate and activate GABA A receptors is uniquely dependent upon the β subunit subtype present within the receptor. Receptors containing β 2 - or β 3 -, but not β 1 subunits, are highly sensitive to the agent. Here, chimeric β 1 /β 2 subunits coexpressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes with human α 6 and γ 2 subunits identified a region distal to the extracellular N-terminal domain as a determinant of the selectivity of etomidate. The mutation of an amino acid (Asn-289) present within the channel domain of the β 3 subunit to Ser (the homologous residue in β 1 ), strongly suppressed the GABA-modulatory and GABA-mimetic effects of etomidate. The replacement of the β 1 subunit Ser-290 by Asn produced the converse effect. When applied intracellularly to mouse L(tk−) cells stably expressing the α 6 β 3 γ 2 subunit combination, etomidate was inert. Hence, the effects of a clinically utilized general anesthetic upon a physiologically relevant target protein are dramatically influenced by a single amino acid. Together with the lack of effect of intracellular etomidate, the data argue against a unitary, lipid-based theory of anesthesia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sites of alcohol and volatile anaesthetic action on GABAA and glycine receptors
Mihic, S. J., Ye, Q., Wick, M. J., Koltchine, V. V., Krasowski, M. D., Finn, S. E., Mascia, M. P., Valenzuela, C. F., Hanson, K. K., Greenblatt, E. P., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/38738 · Cited by 1,219
Cited by
General anaesthesia: from molecular targets to neuronal pathways of sleep and arousal
Franks, N. P. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2372 · Cited by 1,295
Neurosteroids: endogenous regulators of the GABAA receptor
Belelli, D., & Lambert, J. J. (2005) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1703 · Cited by 1,159
Self-citationOlsen, R. W., & Sieghart, W. (2008) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.108.00505 · Cited by 1,064
GABAA receptors: Subtypes provide diversity of function and pharmacology
Olsen, R. W., & Sieghart, W. (2009) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.07.045 · Cited by 982
Molecular and neuronal substrates for general anaesthetics
Rudolph, U., & Antkowiak, B. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1496 · Cited by 772
Metadata
- Authors
- Belelli, D., Lambert, J. J., Peters, J. A., Wafford, K., & Whiting, P. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1997-09-30
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 11031-11036
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2073015466
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The interaction of the general anesthetic etomidate with the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor is influenced by a single amino acid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.94.20.11031
- The paper
- Belelli, D., Lambert, J. J., Peters, J. A., Wafford, K., & Whiting, P. J. (1997). The interaction of the general anesthetic etomidate with the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor is influenced by a single amino acid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.20.11031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.