The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relative mutation rates at di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide microsatellite loci
Open accessAbstract
Using the generalized stepwise mutation model, we propose a method of estimating the relative mutation rates of microsatellite loci, grouped by the repeat motif. Applying ANOVA to the distributions of the allele sizes at microsatellite loci from a set of populations, grouped by repeat motif types, we estimated the effect of population size differences and mutation rate differences among loci. This provides an estimate of motif-type-specific mutation rates up to a multiplicative constant. Applications to four different sets of di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide loci from a number of human populations reveal that, on average, the non-disease-causing microsatellite loci have mutation rates inversely related to their motif sizes. The dinucleotides appear to have mutation rates 1.5–2 times higher than the tetranucleotides, and the non-disease-causing trinucleotides have mutation rates intermediate between the di- and tetranucleotides. In contrast, the disease-causing trinucleotides have mutation rates 3.9–6.9 times larger than the tetranucleotides. Comparison of these estimates with the direct observations of mutation rates at microsatellites indicates that the earlier suggestion of higher mutation rates of tetranucleotides in comparison with the dinucleotides may stem from a nonrandom sampling of tetranucleotide loci in direct mutation assays.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Linkage disequilibrium mapping in isolated founder populations: diastrophic dysplasia in Finland
Hästbacka, J., de la Chapelle, A., Kaitila, I., Sistonen, P., Weaver, A., & Lander, E. (1992) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1192-204 · Cited by 558
Cited by
The landscape of human STR variation
Willems, T., Gymrek, M., Highnam, G., The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Mittelman, D., & Erlich, Y. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.177774.114 · Cited by 283
Dissecting the role of low-complexity regions in the evolution of vertebrate proteins
Radó-Trilla, N., & Albà, M. (2012) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-12-155 · Cited by 89
Mountain, J. L., Knight, A., Jobin, M., Gignoux, C., Miller, A., Lin, A. A., & Underhill, P. A. (2002) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.238602 · Cited by 82
Berger, B., Berger, C., Hecht, W., Hellmann, A., Rohleder, U., Schleenbecker, U., & Parson, W. (2014) · Forensic Science International: Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.07.002 · Cited by 46
Liljegren, M. M., de Muinck, E. J., & Trosvik, P. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159232 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Chakraborty, R., Kimmel, M., Stivers, D. N., Davison, L. J., & Deka, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1997-02-04
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1041-1046
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2005571101
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.