Cited by 116Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsIsotope Analysis in EcologyArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

High-precision position-specific isotope analysis

Open access
Corso, Thomas N., Brenna, J. Thomas·1997·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Intramolecular carbon isotope distributions reflect details of the origin of organic compounds and may record the status of complex systems, such as environmental or physiological states. A strategy is reported here for high-precision determination of 13C/12C ratios at specific positions in organic compounds separated from complex mixtures. Free radical fragmentation of methyl palmitate, a test compound, is induced by an open tube furnace. Two series of peaks corresponding to bond breaking from each end of the molecule are analyzed by isotope ratio mass spectrometry and yield precisions of SD(delta-13C) < 0.4 per thousand. Isotope labeling in the carboxyl, terminal, and methyl positions demonstrates the absence of rearrangement during activation and fragmentation. Negligible isotopic fractionation was observed as degree of fragmentation was adjusted by changing pyrolysis temperature. [1-13C]methyl palmitate with overall delta-13C = 4.06 per thousand, yielded values of +457 per thousand for the carboxyl position, in agreement with expectations from the dilution, and an average of -27.95 per thousand for the rest of the molecule, corresponding to -27.46 per thousand for the olefin series. These data demonstrate the feasibility of automated high-precision position-specific analysis of carbon for molecules contained in complex mixtures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1049

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For tracer studies and isotope balances at isotope tracer levels greater than natural abundance, R or d yield increasingly incorrect mass or amount-of-substance balance with increasing x, whereas atom fraction, isotope-number fraction, or 'iE give accurate results.

    “For tracer studies and isotope balances at isotope tracer levels greater than those of natural abundance, either of the quantities atom fraction, isotope-number fraction, or ' i E give accurate results as opposed to the quantities R( i E) or d i E, which yield increasingly incorrect mass or amount-of-substance balance with increasing values of x( i E). [12,13,18]”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corso, T. N., & Brenna, J. T.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1997-02-18
Volume
94
Issue
4
Pages
1049-1053
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1969321006
Cited by
116
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM049209)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32DK007158)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
methyl palmitate, pyrolysis, isotopic labeling, isotope fractionation, complex mixtures, isotope ratio mass spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review