The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Na + pump low and high ouabain affinity α subunit isoforms are differently distributed in cells
Open accessAbstract
Three isoforms (α1, α2, and α3) of the catalytic (α) subunit of the plasma membrane (PM) Na + pump have been identified in the tissues of birds and mammals. These isoforms differ in their affinities for ions and for the Na + pump inhibitor, ouabain. In the rat, α1 has an unusually low affinity for ouabain. The PM of most rat cells contains both low (α1) and high (α2 or α3) ouabain affinity isoforms, but precise localization of specific isoforms, and their functional significance, are unknown. We employed high resolution immunocytochemical techniques to localize α subunit isoforms in primary cultured rat astrocytes, neurons, and arterial myocytes. Isoform α1 was ubiquitously distributed over the surfaces of these cells. In contrast, high ouabain affinity isoforms (α2 in astrocytes, α3 in neurons and myocytes) were confined to a reticular distribution within the PM that paralleled underlying endoplasmic or sarcoplasmic reticulum. This distribution is identical to that of the PM Na/Ca exchanger. This raises the possibility that α1 may regulate bulk cytosolic Na + , whereas α2 and α3 may regulate Na + and, indirectly, Ca 2+ in a restricted cytosolic space between the PM and reticulum. The high ouabain affinity Na + pumps may thereby modulate reticulum Ca 2+ content and Ca 2+ signaling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rat hippocampal neurons in dispersed cell culture.
Banker, G. A., & Cowan, W. M. (1977) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(77)90594-7 · Cited by 1,110
Ewart, H. S., & Klip, A. (1995) · American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpcell.1995.269.2.c295 · Cited by 460
Cited by
Verkhratsky, A., & Nedergaard, M. (2018) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00042.2016 · Cited by 1,678
Touyz, R. M., & Schiffrin, E. L. (2000) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01471-6 · Cited by 934
Dynamics and Consequences of Potassium Shifts in Skeletal Muscle and Heart During Exercise
Sejersted, O. M., & Sjøgaard, G. (2000) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2000.80.4.1411 · Cited by 490
Verkhratsky, A., Parpura, V., Vardjan, N., & Zorec, R. (2019) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-9913-8_3 · Cited by 312
Larsen, B. R., Assentoft, M., Cotrina, M. L., Hua, S. Z., Nedergaard, M., Kaila, K., Voipio, J., & MacAulay, N. (2014) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.22629 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Juhaszova, M., & Blaustein, M. P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1997-03-04
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1800-1805
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2158115952
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Na + pump low and high ouabain affinity α subunit isoforms are differently distributed in cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.94.5.1800
- The paper
- Juhaszova, M., & Blaustein, M. P. (1997). Na + pump low and high ouabain affinity α subunit isoforms are differently distributed in cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.5.1800
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.