The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sequence patterns indicate an enzymatic involvement in integration of mammalian retroposons
Open accessAbstract
It is commonly accepted that the reverse-transcribed cellular RNA molecules, called retroposons, integrate at staggered breaks in mammalian chromosomes. However, unlike what was previously thought, most of the staggered breaks are not generated by random nicking. One of the two nicks involved is primarily associated with the 5′-TTAAAA hexanucleotide and its variants derived by a single base substitution, particularly A → G and T → C. It is probably generated in the antisense strand between the consensus bases 3′-AA and TTTT complementary to 5′-TTAAAA. The sense strand is nicked at variable distances from the TTAAAA consensus site toward the 3′ end, preferably within 15–16 base pairs. The base composition near the second nicking site is also nonrandom at positions preceding the nick. On the basis of the observed sequence patterns it is proposed that integration of mammalian retroposons is mediated by an enzyme with endonucleolytic activity. The best candidate for such enzyme may be the reverse transcriptase encoded by the L1 non-long-terminal-repeat retrotransposon, which contains a freshly reported domain homologous to the apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease family [Martin, F., Olivares, M., Lopez, M. C. & Alonso, C. (1996) Trends Biochem. Sci. 21, 283–285; Feng, Q., Moran, J. V., Kazazian, H. H. & Boeke, J. D. (1996) Cell 87, 905–916] and shows nicking in vitro with preference for targets similar to 5′-TTAAAA/3′-AATTTT consensus sequence [Feng, Q., Moran, J. V., Kazazian, H. H. & Boeke, J. D. (1996) Cell 87, 905–916]. A model for integration of mammalian retroposons based on the presented data is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human L1 retrotransposon encodes a conserved endonuclease required for retrotransposition
Feng, Q., Moran, J. V., Kazazian, H. H., & Boeke, J. D. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81997-2 · Cited by 1,139
Cited by
Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, C. F. G. R., Lander, E. S., Linton, L. M., Birren, B., Nusbaum, C., Zody, M. C., Baldwin, J., Devon, K., Dewar, K., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057062 · Cited by 24,216
Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome
Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01262 · Cited by 7,187
Mobile Elements: Drivers of Genome Evolution
Kazazian, H. H. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089670 · Cited by 1,922
Hot L1s account for the bulk of retrotransposition in the human population
Brouha, B., Schustak, J., Badge, R. M., Lutz-Prigge, S., Farley, A. H., Moran, J. V., & Kazazian, H. H. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0831042100 · Cited by 1,073
Interspersed repeats and other mementos of transposable elements in mammalian genomes
Smit, A. F. (1999) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/s0959-437x(99)00031-3 · Cited by 949
Metadata
- Authors
- Jurka, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1997-03-04
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1872-1877
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2089471275
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sequence patterns indicate an enzymatic involvement in integration of mammalian retroposons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.94.5.1872
- The paper
- Jurka, J. (1997). Sequence patterns indicate an enzymatic involvement in integration of mammalian retroposons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.5.1872
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.