The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Microcolinearity in sh2 -homologous regions of the maize, rice, and sorghum genomes
Open accessAbstract
Large regions of genomic colinearity have been demonstrated among grass species by recombinational mapping, but the degree of chromosomal conservation at the sub-centimorgan level has not been extensively investigated. We cloned the rice and sorghum genes homologous to the sh2 locus of maize on bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs), and observed that a homologue of the maize a1 gene was also present on each of these BACs. In sorghum, we found a direct duplication of a1 homologues separated by about 10 kb. In maize, sh2 and a1 are approximately 140 kb apart and transcribed in the same direction, with sh2 upstream of a1 . In rice and sorghum, this arrangement is fully conserved. However, the sh2 and a1 homologues are separated by about 19 kb in both rice and sorghum. We found low-copy-number and repetitive DNAs between the sh2 and a1 homologues of sorghum and rice. The sh2 and a1 homologues cross-hybridized, but the repetitive DNA and most low-copy-number sequences between these genes did not. These results indicate that maize, sorghum, and rice have conserved gene order and composition in the sh2 - a1 region, but have acquired extensive qualitative and quantitative differences in the sequences between these genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Polyploidy: recurrent formation and genome evolution
Soltis, D. E., & Soltis, P. S. (1999) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01638-9 · Cited by 1,109
Brachypodium distachyon. A New Model System for Functional Genomics in Grasses
Draper, J. (2001) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.127.4.1539 · Cited by 527
SANMIGUEL, P. (1998) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1006/anbo.1998.0746 · Cited by 431
Self-citationKu, H.-M., Vision, T., Liu, J., & Tanksley, S. D. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.160271297 · Cited by 408
Comparative DNA Sequence Analysis of Wheat and Rice Genomes
Sorrells, M. E., La Rota, M., Bermudez-Kandianis, C. E., Greene, R. A., Kantety, R., Munkvold, J. D., Miftahudin, Mahmoud, A., Ma, X., Gustafson, P. J., et al. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1113003 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, M., SanMiguel, P., de Oliveira, A. C., Woo, S.-S., Zhang, H., Wing, R. A., & Bennetzen, J. L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3431-3435
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2046735481
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microcolinearity in sh2 -homologous regions of the maize, rice, and sorghum genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.94.7.3431
- The paper
- Chen, M., SanMiguel, P., de Oliveira, A. C., Woo, S.-S., Zhang, H., Wing, R. A., & Bennetzen, J. L. (1997). Microcolinearity in sh2 -homologous regions of the maize, rice, and sorghum genomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.7.3431
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.