Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 406

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative DNA Sequence Analysis of Wheat and Rice Genomes

Open access
Sorrells, Mark E., La Rota, Mauricio, Bermudez-Kandianis, Catherine E., Greene, Robert A., Kantety, Ramesh, Munkvold, Jesse D., Miftahudin, Mahmoud, Ahmed, Ma, Xuefeng, Gustafson, Perry J., Qi, Lili L., Echalier, Benjamin, Gill, Bikram S., Matthews, David E., Lazo, Gerard R., Chao, Shiaoman, Anderson, Olin D., Edwards, Hugh, Linkiewicz, Anna M., Dubcovsky, Jorge, Akhunov, Eduard D., Dvorak, Jan, Zhang, Deshui, Nguyen, Henry T., Peng, Junhua, Lapitan, Nora L.V., Gonzalez-Hernandez, Jose L., Anderson, James A., Hossain, Khwaja, Kalavacharla, Venu, Kianian, Shahryar F., Choi, Dong-Woog, Close, Timothy J., Dilbirligi, Muharrem, Gill, Kulvinder S., Steber, Camille, Walker-Simmons, Mary K., McGuire, Patrick E., Qualset, Calvin O.·2003·Genome Research

Abstract

The use of DNA sequence-based comparative genomics for evolutionary studies and for transferring information from model species to crop species has revolutionized molecular genetics and crop improvement strategies. This study compared 4485 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) that were physically mapped in wheat chromosome bins, to the public rice genome sequence data from 2251 ordered BAC/PAC clones using BLAST. A rice genome view of homologous wheat genome locations based on comparative sequence analysis revealed numerous chromosomal rearrangements that will significantly complicate the use of rice as a model for cross-species transfer of information in nonconserved regions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.1113003

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 406

Metadata

Authors
Sorrells, M. E., La Rota, M., Bermudez-Kandianis, C. E., Greene, R. A., Kantety, R., Munkvold, J. D., Miftahudin, Mahmoud, A., Ma, X., Gustafson, P. J., Qi, L. L., Echalier, B., Gill, B. S., Matthews, D. E., Lazo, G. R., Chao, S., Anderson, O. D., Edwards, H., Linkiewicz, A. M., Dubcovsky, J., Akhunov, E. D., Dvorak, J., Zhang, D., Nguyen, H. T., Peng, J., Lapitan, N. L. V., Gonzalez-Hernandez, J. L., Anderson, J. A., Hossain, K., Kalavacharla, V., Kianian, S. F., Choi, D.-W., Close, T. J., Dilbirligi, M., Gill, K. S., Steber, C., Walker-Simmons, M. K., McGuire, P. E., & Qualset, C. O.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2003-08
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
1818-1827
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157717230
Cited by
406
References
37
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative DNA Sequence Analysis of Wheat and Rice Genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.1113003
The paper
Sorrells, M. E., La Rota, M., Bermudez-Kandianis, C. E., Greene, R. A., Kantety, R., Munkvold, J. D., Miftahudin, Mahmoud, A., Ma, X., Gustafson, P. J., Qi, L. L., Echalier, B., Gill, B. S., Matthews, D. E., Lazo, G. R., Chao, S., Anderson, O. D., Edwards, H., Linkiewicz, A. M., . . . Qualset, C. O. (2003). Comparative DNA Sequence Analysis of Wheat and Rice Genomes. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1113003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.