The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Initial frequency of alleles for resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in field populations of Heliothis virescens
Open accessAbstract
The risk of rapid pest adaptation to an insecticide is highly dependent on the initial frequency of resistance alleles in field populations. Because we have lacked empirical estimates of these frequencies, population–genetic models of resistance evolution have relied on a wide range of theoretical estimates. The recent commercialization of genetically engineered cotton that constitutively produces an insecticidal protein derived from the biocontrol agent, Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) has raised concern that we lack data needed to quantify the risk of insect pests such as Heliothis virescens rapidly adapting to this ecologically valuable class of toxins. By individually mating over 2,000 male H. virescens moths collected in four states to females of a Bt toxin-resistant laboratory strain, and screening F 1 and F 2 offspring for tolerance of the toxic protein, we were able to directly estimate the field frequency of alleles for resistance as 1.5 × 10 −3 . This high initial frequency underscores the need for caution in deploying transgenic cotton to control insect pests. Our single-pair mating technique greatly increases the efficiency of detecting recessive resistance alleles. Because alleles that decrease target site sensitivity to Bt toxins and other insecticides are often recessive, this technique could be useful in estimating resistance allele frequencies in other insects exposed to transgenic insecticidal crops or conventional insecticides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sustainability of Transgenic Insecticidal Cultivars: Integrating Pest Genetics and Ecology
Gould, F. (1998) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.701 · Cited by 1,392
Self-citationInsect resistance to Bt crops: lessons from the first billion acres
Tabashnik, B. E., Brévault, T., & Carrière, Y. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2597 · Cited by 1,086
Economic, Ecological, Food Safety, and Social Consequences of the Deployment of Bt Transgenic Plants
Shelton, A. M., Zhao, J.-Z., & Roush, R. T. (2002) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145309 · Cited by 794
Roush, R. T. (1998) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0330 · Cited by 444
Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants
(GMO), E. P. O. G. M. O. (2010) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1879 · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Authors
- Gould, F., Anderson, A., Jones, A., Sumerford, D., Heckel, D. G., Lopez, J., Micinski, S., Leonard, R., & Laster, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1997-04-15
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3519-3523
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2110062289
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Initial frequency of alleles for resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in field populations of Heliothis virescens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.94.8.3519
- The paper
- Gould, F., Anderson, A., Jones, A., Sumerford, D., Heckel, D. G., Lopez, J., Micinski, S., Leonard, R., & Laster, M. (1997). Initial frequency of alleles for resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in field populations of Heliothis virescens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.8.3519
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.