Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 497

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Processing of the Ebola virus glycoprotein by the proprotein convertase furin

Open access
Volchkov, Viktor E., Feldmann, Heinz, Volchkova, Valentina A., Klenk, Hans-Dieter·1998·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

In the present study, we have investigated processing and maturation of the envelope glycoprotein (GP) of Ebola virus. When GP expressed from vaccinia virus vectors was analyzed by pulse–chase experiments, the mature form and two different precursors were identified. First, the endoplasmic reticulum form preGP er , full-length GP with oligomannosidic N -glycans, was detected. preGP er (110 kDa) was replaced by the Golgi-specific form preGP (160 kDa), full-length GP containing mature carbohydrates. preGP was finally converted by proteolysis into mature GP 1,2 , which consisted of two disulfide-linked cleavage products, the amino-terminal 140-kDa fragment GP 1 , and the carboxyl-terminal 26-kDa fragment GP 2 . GP 1,2 was also identified in Ebola virions. Studies employing site-directed mutagenesis revealed that GP was cleaved at a multibasic amino acid motif located at positions 497 to 501 of the ORF. Cleavage was blocked by a peptidyl chloromethylketone containing such a motif. GP is cleaved by the proprotein convertase furin. This was indicated by the observation that cleavage did not occur when GP was expressed in furin-defective LoVo cells but that it was restored in these cells by vector-expressed furin. The Reston subtype, which differs from all other Ebola viruses by its low human pathogenicity, has a reduced cleavability due to a mutation at the cleavage site. As a result of these observations, it should now be considered that proteolytic processing of GP may be an important determinant for the pathogenicity of Ebola virus.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.95.10.5762

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 497

Metadata

Authors
Volchkov, V. E., Feldmann, H., Volchkova, V. A., & Klenk, H.-D.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1998-05-12
Volume
95
Issue
10
Pages
5762-5767
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2067510101
Cited by
497
References
2
FWCI
14.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Processing of the Ebola virus glycoprotein by the proprotein convertase furin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.95.10.5762
The paper
Volchkov, V. E., Feldmann, H., Volchkova, V. A., & Klenk, H.-D. (1998). Processing of the Ebola virus glycoprotein by the proprotein convertase furin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.10.5762

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.