The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A negative regulator mediates quorum-sensing control of exopolysaccharide production in Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii
Open accessAbstract
Classical quorum-sensing (autoinduction) regulation, as exemplified by the lux system of Vibrio fischeri , requires N -acyl homoserine lactone (AHL) signals to stimulate cognate transcriptional activators for the cell density-dependent expression of specific target gene systems. For Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii , a bacterial pathogen of sweet corn and maize, the extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) stewartan is a major virulence factor, and its production is controlled by quorum sensing in a population density-dependent manner. Two genes, esaI and esaR , encode essential regulatory proteins for quorum sensing. EsaI is the AHL signal synthase, and EsaR is the cognate gene regulator. esaI , Δ esaR , and Δ esaI-esaR mutations were constructed to establish the regulatory role of EsaR. We report here that strains containing an esaR mutation produce high levels of EPS independently of cell density and in the absence of the AHL signal. Our data indicate that quorum-sensing regulation in P. s. subsp. stewartii , in contrast to most other described systems, uses EsaR to repress EPS synthesis at low cell density, and that derepression requires micromolar amounts of AHL. In addition, derepressed esaR strains, which synthesize EPS constitutively at low cell densities, were significantly less virulent than the wild-type parent. This finding suggests that quorum sensing in P. s. subsp. stewartii may be a mechanism to delay the expression of EPS during the early stages of infection so that it does not interfere with other mechanisms of pathogenesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Quorum sensing signal-response systems in Gram-negative bacteria
Papenfort, K., & Bassler, B. L. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.89 · Cited by 2,256
Listening in on bacteria: acyl-homoserine lactone signalling
Fuqua, C., & Greenberg, E. P. (2002) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm907 · Cited by 1,079
Q UORUM S ENSING IN P LANT-P ATHOGENIC B ACTERIA
von Bodman, S. B., Bauer, W. D., & Coplin, D. L. (2003) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095652 · Cited by 587
Self-citationHolden, M. T. G., Ram Chhabra, S., De Nys, R., Stead, P., Bainton, N. J., Hill, P. J., Manefield, M., Kumar, N., Labatte, M., England, D., et al. (1999) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01577.x · Cited by 579
Impact of the agr Quorum‐Sensing System on Adherence to Polystyrene in Staphylococcus aureus
Vuong, C., Saenz, H. L., Götz, F., & Otto, M. (2000) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/317606 · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- von Bodman, S. B., Majerczak, D. R., & Coplin, D. L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1998-06-23
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 7687-7692
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2047630852
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A negative regulator mediates quorum-sensing control of exopolysaccharide production in Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.95.13.7687
- The paper
- von Bodman, S. B., Majerczak, D. R., & Coplin, D. L. (1998). A negative regulator mediates quorum-sensing control of exopolysaccharide production in Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.13.7687
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.