Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Basal and human papillomavirus E6 oncoprotein-induced degradation of Myc proteins by the ubiquitin pathway

Gross-Mesilaty, Shlomit, Reinstein, Eyal, Bercovich, Beatrice, Tobias, Karin E., Schwartz, Alan L., Kahana, Chaim, Ciechanover, Aaron·1998·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

We have previously shown that the degradation of c-myc and N- myc in vitro is mediated by the ubiquitin system. However, the role of the system in targeting the myc proteins in vivo and the identity of the conjugating enzymes and possible ancillary proteins involved has remained obscure. Here we report that the degradation of the myc proteins in cells is inhibited by lactacystin and MG132, two inhibitors of the 20S proteasome. Inhibition is accompanied by accumulation of myc-ubiquitin conjugates. Dissection of the ancillary proteins involved revealed that the high-risk human papillomavirus oncoprotein E6-16 stimulates conjugation and subsequent degradation of the myc proteins in vitro . Expression of E6-16 in cells results in significant shortening of the t 1/2 of the myc proteins with subsequent decrease in their cellular level. Analysis of the conjugating enzymes revealed that under basal conditions the proteins can be conjugated by two pairs of E2s and E3s—E2-14 kDa and E3α involved in the “N-end rule” pathway, and E2-F1 (UbcH7) and E3-Fos involved also in conjugation of c-Fos. In the presence of E6-16, a third pair, E2-F1 and E6-AP mediate conjugation of myc by means of a mechanism that appears to be similar to that involved in the targeting of p53, formation of a myc⋅E6⋅E6–AP targeting complex. It is possible that in certain cells E6-mediated targeting of myc prevents myc-induced apoptosis and thus ensures maintenance of viral infection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.95.14.8058

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1101/gad.4.12a.2025 · DOI
  2. 10.1126/science.3289117 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1126/science.2006410 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0065-230X(08)60476-5 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90123-T · DOI
  6. D S Askew, R A Ashmun, B C Simmons, J L Cleveland Oncogene 6, 1915–1922 (1991).
  7. 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.004113 · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.81.22.7046 · DOI
  9. 10.1128/mcb.6.12.4450-4457.1986 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0968-0004(96)10054-2 · DOI
  11. 10.1146/annurev.genet.30.1.405 · DOI
  12. 10.1073/pnas.95.6.2727 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90285-K · DOI
  14. 10.1074/jbc.272.14.9002 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90384-3 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90426-Q · DOI
  17. 10.1074/jbc.271.1.302 · DOI
  18. 10.1073/pnas.88.1.139 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0021-9258(20)82050-X · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)39648-6 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)36920-X · DOI
  22. 10.1128/MCB.15.12.7106 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00754.x · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)45327-1 · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.84.7.1829 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/sj.onc.1201625 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)68497-2 · DOI
  28. 10.1128/jvi.65.8.4534-4538.1991 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/jnci/84.19.1525 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gross-Mesilaty, S., Reinstein, E., Bercovich, B., Tobias, K. E., Schwartz, A. L., Kahana, C., & Ciechanover, A.
Affiliations
Department of Biochemistry and the Rappaport Family Institute for Research in the Medical Sciences, The Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, P.O. Box 9649, Haifa 31096, Israel; Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel; and Edward Mallincrodt Departments of Pediatrics and Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, Children’s Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1998-07-07
Volume
95
Issue
14
Pages
8058-8063
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
177
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review