The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Jasmonate-induced responses are costly but benefit plants under attack in native populations
Open accessAbstract
Herbivore attack is widely known to reduce food quality and to increase chemical defenses and other traits responsible for herbivore resistance. Inducible defenses are commonly thought to allow plants to forgo the costs of defense when not needed; however, neither their defensive function (increasing a plant’s fitness) nor their cost-savings function have been demonstrated in nature. The root-produced toxin nicotine increases after herbivore attack in the native, postfire annual Nicotiana attenuata and is internally activated by the wound hormone, jasmonic acid. I treated the roots of plants with the methyl ester of this hormone (MeJA) to elicit a response in one member of each of 745 matched pairs of plants growing in native populations with different probabilities of attack from herbivores, and measured the lifetime production of viable seed. In populations with intermediate rates of attack, induced plants were attacked less often by herbivores and survived to produce more seed than did their uninduced counterparts. Previous induction did not significantly increase the fitness of plants suffering high rates of attack. However, if plants had not been attacked, induced plants produced less seed than did their uninduced counterparts. Jasmonate-induced responses function as defenses but are costly, and inducibility allows this species to forgo these costs when the defenses are unnecessary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the field
Atkinson, N. J., & Urwin, P. E. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ers100 · Cited by 1,880
Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests
Franceschi, V. R., Krokene, P., Christiansen, E., & Krekling, T. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01436.x · Cited by 1,120
Volatile Signaling in Plant-Plant Interactions: "Talking Trees" in the Genomics Era
Baldwin, I. T., Halitschke, R., Paschold, A., von Dahl, C. C., & Preston, C. A. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1118446 · Cited by 892
Self-citationSystemic Acquired Resistance and Induced Systemic Resistance in Conventional Agriculture
Vallad, G. E., & Goodman, R. M. (2004) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.1920 · Cited by 819
Plant resistance towards insect herbivores: a dynamic interaction
Gatehouse, J. A. (2002) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00519.x · Cited by 704
Metadata
- Authors
- Baldwin, I. T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1998-07-07
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 8113-8118
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2087352977
- Cited by
- 738
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 58.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Jasmonate-induced responses are costly but benefit plants under attack in native populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.95.14.8113
- The paper
- Baldwin, I. T. (1998). Jasmonate-induced responses are costly but benefit plants under attack in native populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.14.8113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.