Cited by 607Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Functional connectivity of the angular gyrus in normal reading and dyslexia

Open access
Horwitz, B., Rumsey, J. M., Donohue, B. C.·1998·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The classic neurologic model for reading, based on studies of patients with acquired alexia, hypothesizes functional linkages between the angular gyrus in the left hemisphere and visual association areas in the occipital and temporal lobes. The angular gyrus also is thought to have functional links with posterior language areas (e.g., Wernicke's area), because it is presumed to be involved in mapping visually presented inputs onto linguistic representations. Using positron emission tomography , we demonstrate in normal men that regional cerebral blood flow in the left angular gyrus shows strong within-task, across-subjects correlations (i.e., functional connectivity) with regional cerebral blood flow in extrastriate occipital and temporal lobe regions during single word reading. In contrast, the left angular gyrus is functionally disconnected from these regions in men with persistent developmental dyslexia, suggesting that the anatomical disconnection of the left angular gyrus from other brain regions that are part of the "normal" brain reading network in many cases of acquired alexia is mirrored by its functional disconnection in developmental dyslexia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8939

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Functional areas probably include the left angular gyrus, left inferior frontal cortex, and temporal regions anterior to the VWFA.

    “Although the precise projections from VWFA to systems involved in lexical, semantic and phonological processes are currently less clearly defined, functional areas probably include the left angular gyrus [52], left inferior frontal cortex [53], and temporal regions anterior to the VWFA [54].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 607

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [2]Bookheimer S Y, Zeffiro T A, Blaxton T, Gaillard W, Theodore W. Hum Brain Mapp. 1995;3:93–106. [Google Scholar]
  2. [8]Horwitz B, Soncrant T T, Haxby J V. In: Advances in Metabolic Mapping Techniques for Brain Imaging of Behavioral and Learning Functions. Gonzalez-Lima F, Finkenstaedt T, Scheich H, editors. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic; 1992. pp. 189–217. [Google Scholar]
  3. [12]Dejerine J. Memoires Soc Biol. 1892;44:61–90. [Google Scholar]
  4. [18]American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th Ed. Washington, D.C.: Am. Psychiatr. Assoc.; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  5. [19]Wiederholt J R, Bryant B R. Gray Oral Reading Test. 3rd Ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  6. [26]McIntosh A R, Gonzalez-Lima F. In: Advances in Metabolic Mapping Techniques for Brain Imaging of Behavioral and Learning Functions. Gonzalez-Lima F, Finkenstaedt T, Scheich H, editors. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic; 1992. pp. 219–255. [Google Scholar]
  7. [35]Rumsey J M, Horwitz B, Donohue B C, Nace K, Maisog J M, Andreason P. NeuroImage. 1997;5:S570. doi: 10.1093/brain/120.5.739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI

Authors
Horwitz, B., Rumsey, J. M., & Donohue, B. C.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1998-07-21
Volume
95
Issue
15
Pages
8939-8944
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1997846670
Cited by
607
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 35
FWCI
36.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
angular gyrus, functional connectivity, developmental dyslexia, reading network, regional cerebral blood flow, visual word recognition, occipital lobe, temporal lobe, Wernicke's area, neuroimaging of reading
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Dyslexia, Humans, Male, Reading, Regional Blood Flow, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Dentate Gyrus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review