The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defense gene induction in tobacco by nitric oxide, cyclic GMP, and cyclic ADP-ribose
Open accessAbstract
Reactive oxygen species are believed to perform multiple roles during plant defense responses to microbial attack, acting in the initial defense and possibly as cellular signaling molecules. In animals, nitric oxide (NO) is an important redox-active signaling molecule. Here we show that infection of resistant, but not susceptible, tobacco with tobacco mosaic virus resulted in enhanced NO synthase (NOS) activity. Furthermore, administration of NO donors or recombinant mammalian NOS to tobacco plants or tobacco suspension cells triggered expression of the defense-related genes encoding pathogenesis-related 1 protein and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL). These genes were also induced by cyclic GMP (cGMP) and cyclic ADP-ribose, two molecules that can serve as second messengers for NO signaling in mammals. Consistent with cGMP acting as a second messenger in tobacco, NO treatment induced dramatic and transient increases in endogenous cGMP levels. Furthermore, NO-induced activation of PAL was blocked by 6-anilino-5,8-quinolinedione and 1 H -(1,2,4)-oxadiazole[4,3- a ]quinoxalin-1-one, two inhibitors of guanylate cyclase. Although 6-anilino-5,8-quinolinedione fully blocked PAL activation, inhibition by 1 H -(1,2,4)-oxadiazole[4,3- a ]quinoxalin-1-one was not entirely complete, suggesting the existence of cGMP-independent, as well as cGMP-dependent, NO signaling. We conclude that several critical players of animal NO signaling are also operative in plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biochemistry of nitric oxide and its redox-activated forms
Stamler, J. S., Singel, D. J., & Loscalzo, J. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1281928 · Cited by 2,744
Cited by
WHITE, P. J. (2003) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcg164 · Cited by 2,381
Nathan, C., & Shiloh, M. U. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.16.8841 · Cited by 1,469
Nitric oxide signalling in plants
Neill, S. J., Desikan, R., & Hancock, J. T. (2003) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00804.x · Cited by 874
Proteomic Identification of S -Nitrosylated Proteins in Arabidopsis
Lindermayr, C., Saalbach, G., & Durner, J. (2005) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.104.058719 · Cited by 734
Self-citationThe Arabidopsis dnd1“defense, no death” gene encodes a mutated cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel
Clough, S. J., Fengler, K. A., Yu, I.-C., Lippok, B., Smith, R. K., & Bent, A. F. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.150005697 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Durner, J., Wendehenne, D., & Klessig, D. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1998-08-18
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 10328-10333
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1991251241
- Cited by
- 1,331
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 73.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defense gene induction in tobacco by nitric oxide, cyclic GMP, and cyclic ADP-ribose. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.95.17.10328
- The paper
- Durner, J., Wendehenne, D., & Klessig, D. F. (1998). Defense gene induction in tobacco by nitric oxide, cyclic GMP, and cyclic ADP-ribose. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.17.10328
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.