The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The structural distribution of cooperative interactions in proteins: Analysis of the native state ensemble
Open accessAbstract
Cooperative interactions link the behavior of different amino acid residues within a protein molecule. As a result, the effects of chemical or physical perturbations to any given residue are propagated to other residues by an intricate network of interactions. Very often, amino acids “sense” the effects of perturbations occurring at very distant locations in the protein molecule. In these studies, we have investigated by computer simulation the structural distribution of those interactions. We show here that cooperative interactions are not intrinsically bi-directional and that different residues play different roles within the intricate network of interactions existing in a protein. The effect of a perturbation to residue j on residue k is not necessarily equal to the effect of the same perturbation to residue k on residue j. In this paper, we introduce a computer algorithm aimed at mapping the network of cooperative interactions within a protein. This algorithm exhaustively performs single site thermodynamic mutations to each residue in the protein and examines the effects of those mutations on the distribution of conformational states. The algorithm has been applied to three different proteins (λ repressor fragment 6–85, chymotrypsin inhibitor 2, and barnase). This algorithm accounts well for the observed behavior of these proteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kenakin, T., & Miller, L. J. (2010) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.108.000992 · Cited by 573
Binding MOAD (Mother Of All Databases)
Hu, L., Benson, M. L., Smith, R. D., Lerner, M. G., & Carlson, H. A. (2005) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20512 · Cited by 328
Accommodating Protein Flexibility in Computational Drug Design,
Carlson, H. A., & McCammon, J. A. (2000) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0026-895x(24)23192-8 · Cited by 324
Structural and Energetic Basis of Allostery
Hilser, V. J., Wrabl, J. O., & Motlagh, H. N. (2012) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-050511-102319 · Cited by 317
Self-citationIgumenova, T. I., Frederick, K. K., & Wand, A. J. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040422h · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Hilser, V. J., Dowdy, D., Oas, T. G., & Freire, E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1998-08-18
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 9903-9908
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2046912614
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The structural distribution of cooperative interactions in proteins: Analysis of the native state ensemble. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.95.17.9903
- The paper
- Hilser, V. J., Dowdy, D., Oas, T. G., & Freire, E. (1998). The structural distribution of cooperative interactions in proteins: Analysis of the native state ensemble. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.17.9903
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.