Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 490

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fok I dimerization is required for DNA cleavage

Open access
Bitinaite, Jurate, Wah, David A., Aggarwal, Aneel K., Schildkraut, Ira·1998·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Fok I is a type IIs restriction endonuclease comprised of a DNA recognition domain and a catalytic domain. The structural similarity of the Fok I catalytic domain to the type II restriction endonuclease Bam HI monomer suggested that the Fok I catalytic domains may dimerize. In addition, the Fok I structure, presented in an accompanying paper in this issue of Proceedings , reveals a dimerization interface between catalytic domains. We provide evidence here that Fok I catalytic domain must dimerize for DNA cleavage to occur. First, we show that the rate of DNA cleavage catalyzed by various concentrations of Fok I are not directly proportional to the protein concentration, suggesting a cooperative effect for DNA cleavage. Second, we constructed a Fok I variant, Fok N13Y, which is unable to bind the Fok I recognition sequence but when mixed with wild-type Fok I increases the rate of DNA cleavage. Additionally, the Fok I catalytic domain that lacks the DNA binding domain was shown to increase the rate of wild-type Fok I cleavage of DNA. We also constructed an Fok I variant, Fok D483A, R487A, which should be defective for dimerization because the altered residues reside at the putative dimerization interface. Consistent with the Fok I dimerization model, the variant Fok D483A, R487A revealed greatly impaired DNA cleavage. Based on our work and previous reports, we discuss a pathway of DNA binding, dimerization, and cleavage by Fok I endonuclease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10570

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 490

Metadata

Authors
Bitinaite, J., Wah, D. A., Aggarwal, A. K., & Schildkraut, I.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1998-09
Volume
95
Issue
18
Pages
10570-10575
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2126237980
Cited by
490
References
21
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fok I dimerization is required for DNA cleavage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.95.18.10570
The paper
Bitinaite, J., Wah, D. A., Aggarwal, A. K., & Schildkraut, I. (1998). Fok I dimerization is required for DNA cleavage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.18.10570

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.