Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 231

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Induction of microsatellite instability by oxidative DNA damage

Open access
Jackson, Aimee L., Chen, Ru, Loeb, Lawrence A.·1998·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Instability of repetitive sequences, both in intronic sequences and within coding regions, has been demonstrated to be a hallmark of genomic instability in human cancer. Understanding how these mutational events arise may provide an opportunity for prevention or early intervention in cancer development. To study the source of this instability, we have identified a region of the β-lactamase gene that is tolerant to the insertion of fragments of exogenous DNA as large as 1,614 bp with minimal loss of enzyme activity, as determined by antibiotic resistance. Fragments inserted out-of-frame render Escherichia coli sensitive to antibiotic, and compensatory frameshift mutations that restore the reading frame of β-lactamase can be selected on the basis of antibiotic resistance. We have utilized this site to insert a synthetic microsatellite sequence within the β-lactamase gene and selected for mutations yielding frameshifts. This assay provides for detection of one frameshift mutation in a background of 10 6 wild-type sequences. Mismatch repair deficiency increased the observed frameshift frequency ≈300-fold. Exposure of plasmid containing microsatellite sequences to hydrogen peroxide resulted in frameshift mutations that were localized exclusively to the microsatellite sequences, whereas DNA damage by UV or N -methyl- N ′-nitro- N -nitrosoguanidine did not result in enhanced mutagenesis. We postulate that in tumor cells, endogenous production of oxygen free radicals may be a major factor in promoting instability of microsatellite sequences. This β-lactamase assay may provide a sensitive methodology for the detection and quantitation of mutations associated with the development of cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12468

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 231

Metadata

Authors
Jackson, A. L., Chen, R., & Loeb, L. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1998-10-13
Volume
95
Issue
21
Pages
12468-12473
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2170362789
Cited by
231
References
3
FWCI
10.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Induction of microsatellite instability by oxidative DNA damage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.95.21.12468
The paper
Jackson, A. L., Chen, R., & Loeb, L. A. (1998). Induction of microsatellite instability by oxidative DNA damage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.21.12468

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.