The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Competition among body parts in the development and evolution of insect morphology
Open accessAbstract
Changes in form during ontogeny and evolution depend in large measure on changes in the relative growth of the various parts of the body. The current consensus in developmental biology is that the final size of appendages and internal organs is regulated autonomously, within the structure itself. Size regulation of body parts typically requires no external control and is thought to be relatively insensitive to signals from the developmental environment. We show in two very different systems, butterfly wings and beetle horns, that experimentally induced changes in the allocation of developmental resources to one trait produces compensatory changes in the relative sizes of other traits. These findings illustrate that interaction among body parts in development is part of the mechanism of size regulation of those parts. Furthermore, in the case of beetle horns, we show that the tradeoff in size is manifest as a significant negative genetic correlation among the involved body parts and, therefore, constitutes a developmental source of genetic constraint on the evolution of body form.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIVARIATE EVOLUTION, APPLIED TO BRAIN:BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY
Lande, R. (1979) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04694.x · Cited by 2,648
Genetics of Growth Predict Patterns of Brain-Size Evolution
Riska, B., & Atchley, W. R. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.229.4714.668 · Cited by 137
Cited by
The physiology of life history trade-offs in animals
Zera, A. J., & Harshman, L. G. (2001) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114006 · Cited by 1,577
Parasitic manipulation: where are we and where should we go?
Thomas, F., Adamo, S., & Moore, J. (2005) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2004.06.010 · Cited by 580
Size and shape: the developmental regulation of static allometry in insects
Shingleton, A. W., Frankino, W. A., Flatt, T., Nijhout, H. F., & Emlen, D. J. (2007) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20584 · Cited by 355
Self-citationLarval food limitation in butterflies: effects on adult resource allocation and fitness
Boggs, C. L., & Freeman, K. D. (2005) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-005-0076-6 · Cited by 309
A scale‐dependent framework for trade‐offs, syndromes, and specialization in organismal biology
Agrawal, A. A. (2020) · Ecology · doi:10.1002/ecy.2924 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Nijhout, H. F., & Emlen, D. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1998-03-31
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3685-3689
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2064841986
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competition among body parts in the development and evolution of insect morphology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.95.7.3685
- The paper
- Nijhout, H. F., & Emlen, D. J. (1998). Competition among body parts in the development and evolution of insect morphology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.7.3685
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.