The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cortical auditory signal processing in poor readers
Open accessAbstract
Magnetoencephalographic responses recorded from auditory cortex evoked by brief and rapidly successive stimuli differed between adults with poor vs. good reading abilities in four important ways. First, the response amplitude evoked by short-duration acoustic stimuli was stronger in the post-stimulus time range of 150–200 ms in poor readers than in normal readers. Second, response amplitude to rapidly successive and brief stimuli that were identical or that differed significantly in frequency were substantially weaker in poor readers compared with controls, for interstimulus intervals of 100 or 200 ms, but not for an interstimulus interval of 500 ms. Third, this neurological deficit closely paralleled subjects’ ability to distinguish between and to reconstruct the order of presentation of those stimulus sequences. Fourth, the average distributed response coherence evoked by rapidly successive stimuli was significantly weaker in the β- and γ-band frequency ranges (20–60 Hz) in poor readers, compared with controls. These results provide direct electrophysiological evidence supporting the hypothesis that reading disabilities are correlated with the abnormal neural representation of brief and rapidly successive sensory inputs, manifested in this study at the entry level of the cortical auditory/aural speech representational system(s).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills
Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192 · Cited by 3,303
Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia
Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Constable, R. T., Mencl, W. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Liberman, A. M., Skudlarski, P., Fletcher, J. M., et al. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.5.2636 · Cited by 872
Cited by
Model of autism: increased ratio of excitation/inhibition in key neural systems
Rubenstein, J. L. R., & Merzenich, M. M. (2003) · Genes, Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1034/j.1601-183x.2003.00037.x · Cited by 2,768
Self-citationMicrostructure of Temporo-Parietal White Matter as a Basis for Reading Ability
Klingberg, T., Hedehus, M., Temple, E., Salz, T., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Moseley, M. E., & Poldrack, R. A. (2000) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80911-3 · Cited by 731
Self-citationAnvari, S. H., Trainor, L. J., Woodside, J., & Levy, B. A. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-0965(02)00124-8 · Cited by 670
Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex
Ahissar, E., Nagarajan, S., Ahissar, M., Protopapas, A., Mahncke, H., & Merzenich, M. M. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.201400998 · Cited by 538
Self-citationImpaired processing of rapid stimulus sequences in dyslexia
Hari, R., & Renvall, H. (2001) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01801-5 · Cited by 527
Metadata
- Authors
- Nagarajan, S., Mahncke, H., Salz, T., Tallal, P., Roberts, T., & Merzenich, M. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-05-25
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 6483-6488
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2089755222
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 39.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cortical auditory signal processing in poor readers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.11.6483
- The paper
- Nagarajan, S., Mahncke, H., Salz, T., Tallal, P., Roberts, T., & Merzenich, M. M. (1999). Cortical auditory signal processing in poor readers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.11.6483
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.