The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rapid p53 sequence analysis in primary lung cancer using an oligonucleotide probe array
Open accessAbstract
The p53 gene was sequenced in 100 primary human lung cancers by using direct dideoxynucleotide cycle sequencing and compared with sequence analysis by using the p53 GeneChip assay. Differences in sequence analysis between the two techniques were further evaluated to determine the accuracy and limitations of each method. p53 mutations were either detected by using both techniques or, if only detected by one technique, were confirmed by using mutation-specific oligonucleotide hybridization. Dideoxynucleotide sequencing of the conserved regions of the p53 gene (exons 5–9) detected 76% of the mutations within this region of the gene. The GeneChip p53 assay detected 81% of all (exons 2–11) mutations, including 80% of the mutations within the conserved regions of the gene. The GeneChip assay detected 46 of 52 missense mutations (88%), but 0 of 5 frameshift mutations. The specificity of direct sequencing and of the p53 GeneChip assay at detecting p53 mutations were 100% and 98%, respectively. The GeneChip p53 assay is a rapid and reasonably accurate approach for detecting p53 mutations; however, neither direct sequencing nor the p53 GeneChip are infallible at p53 mutation detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
When mutants gain new powers: News from the mutant p53 field
Brosh, R., & Rotter, V. (2009) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2693 · Cited by 1,132
Assessing TP53 status in human tumours to evaluate clinical outcome
Soussi, T., & Béroud, C. (2001) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/35106009 · Cited by 659
Emerging molecular markers of cancer
Sidransky, D. (2002) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc755 · Cited by 662
Self-citationMDM2 inhibitors for cancer therapy
Vassilev, L. T. (2007) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2006.11.002 · Cited by 532
Number of Nevi and Early-Life Ambient UV Exposure Are Associated with BRAF-Mutant Melanoma
Thomas, N. E., Edmiston, S. N., Alexander, A., Millikan, R. C., Groben, P. A., Hao, H., Tolbert, D., Berwick, M., Busam, K., Begg, C. B., et al. (2007) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-06-1038 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahrendt, S. A., Halachmi, S., Chow, J. T., Wu, L., Halachmi, N., Yang, S. C., Wehage, S., Jen, J., & Sidransky, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-06-22
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 7382-7387
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1988145726
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid p53 sequence analysis in primary lung cancer using an oligonucleotide probe array. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.13.7382
- The paper
- Ahrendt, S. A., Halachmi, S., Chow, J. T., Wu, L., Halachmi, N., Yang, S. C., Wehage, S., Jen, J., & Sidransky, D. (1999). Rapid p53 sequence analysis in primary lung cancer using an oligonucleotide probe array. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.13.7382
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.