Cited by 329Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

The neural substrate and temporal dynamics of interference effects in working memory as revealed by event-related functional MRI

Open access
D’Esposito, Mark, Postle, Bradley R., Jonides, John, Smith, Edward E.·1999·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Research on the prefrontal cortex (PFC) of monkeys and humans indicates that this region supports a heterogeneous repertoire of mental processes that contribute to many complex behaviors, such as working memory. Anatomical evidence for some of these processes derives from functional neuroimaging experiments using blocked experimental designs, which average signal across all components of many trials and therefore cannot dissociate distinct processes with different time courses. Using event-related functional MRI, we were able to isolate temporally the neural correlates of processes contributing to the target presentation, delay, and probe portions of an item-recognition task. Two types of trials were of greatest interest: those with Recent Negative probes that matched an item from the target set of the previous, but not the present, two trials, and those with Nonrecent Negative probes that did not match a target item from either the present or the two previous trials. There was no difference between the two trial types in target presentation (i.e., encoding) or delay-period (i.e., active maintenance) PFC activation, but there was significantly greater activation for Recent Negatives than Nonrecent Negative activation associated with the probe period within left ventrolateral PFC. These findings characterize spatially and temporally a proactive interference effect that may reflect the operation of a PFC-mediated response-inhibition mechanism that contributes to working memory performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.96.13.7514

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 329

Authors
D’Esposito, M., Postle, B. R., Jonides, J., & Smith, E. E.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1999-06-22
Volume
96
Issue
13
Pages
7514-7519
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2163080134
Cited by
329
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 19
FWCI
8.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Federation for Aging Research
  • National Institutes of Health (5k08ns001762-05, 7r01ag013483-05, NS01762, AG13483)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG 13483)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 01762)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
working memory, proactive interference, prefrontal cortex, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, response inhibition, temporal dynamics, memory maintenance, neural correlates
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Neurons, Radiography, Task Performance and Analysis, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review