Cited by 92Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Cognitive inflexibility and frontal–cortical activation in pediatric obsessive–compulsive disorder

Open access
Britton, Jennifer C., Rauch, Scott L., Rosso, Isabelle M., Killgore, William D.S., Price, Lauren M., Ragan, Jennifer, Chosak, Anne, Hezel, Dianne M. +5 more·2010·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Deficits in cognitive flexibility and response inhibition have been linked to perturbations in cortico-striatal-thalamic circuitry in adult obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Although similar cognitive deficits have been identified in pediatric OCD, few neuroimaging studies have been conducted to examine its neural correlates in the developing brain. In this study, we tested hypotheses regarding group differences in the behavioral and neural correlates of cognitive flexibility in a pediatric OCD and a healthy comparison (HC) sample. Method In this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, a pediatric sample of 10- to 17-year-old subjects, 15 with OCD and 20 HC, completed a set-shifting task. The task, requiring an extradimensional shift to identify a target, examines cognitive flexibility. Within each block, the dimension (color or shape) that identified the target either alternated (i.e., mixed) or remained unchanged (i.e., repeated). Results Compared with the HC group, the OCD group tended to be slower to respond to trials within mixed blocks. Compared with the HC group, the OCD group exhibited less left inferior frontal gyrus/BA47 activation in the set-shifting contrast (i.e., HC > OCD, mixed versus repeated); only the HC group exhibited significant activation in this region. The correlation between set shifting-induced right caudate activation and shift cost (i.e., reaction time differential in response to mixed versus repeated trials) was significantly different between HC and OCD groups, in that we found a positive correlation in HC and a negative correlation in OCD. Conclusions In pediatric OCD, less fronto-striatal activation may explain previously identified deficits in shifting cognitive sets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.006

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

0 of 66 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Age did not correlate with switch cost in either group or the group as a whole.

    “Age did not correlate with switch cost in either group (p > .7) or the group as a whole (p > .9).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Accuracy rates for the first block of shape and color, but not mixed blocks, were significantly lower than for subsequent blocks.

    “The accuracy rates for the first block of the shape and color, but not the mixed blocks [block × condition effect: F(6, 198) = 3.0, p < .03] were significantly lower than the accuracy rates for subsequent blocks [block effect: [F(3, 99) = 22.2, p < .001].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The accuracy rates during the color block were lower than during the shape and mixed blocks.

    “The accuracy rates during the color block (OCD: 88.7% ± 9.4%, HC: 89.8% ± 9.6%) were lower than the shape (OCD: 91.8% ± 6.1%, HC: 92.9% ± 7.9%) and mixed blocks (OCD: 93.7% ± 5.3%, HC: 93.9% ± 5.9%) [condition effect: F(2, 66) = 12.1, p < .001].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    There were no group or group × condition interactions for accuracy.

    “No group or group × condition interactions were noted (all p > .7).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In the OCD group, total CY-BOCS score was not significantly correlated with mixed versus repeated activation in the inferior frontal gyrus or caudate.

    “In the OCD group, the total CY-BOCS score was not significantly correlated with mixed versus repeated activation in the inferior frontal gyrus or caudate, two regions showing between-group differences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 16
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 31
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    After accounting for intracranial volume, no significant group differences in overall gray matter, white matter, or CSF were found.

    “After accounting for intracranial volume in regression analyses, no significant group differences in overall gray matter, white matter, or CSF were found (all p > .15).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Compared with HC, the OCD group showed greater gray matter density in medial frontal gyrus/BA10, OFC, and rACC.

    “Compared with the HC group, the OCD group showed greater gray matter density in medial frontal gyrus/BA10 [(−18, 58, −10), Z = 3.68, k = 34], OFC [(−8, 42, −14), Z = 3.34, k = 10], and rACC [(−8, 56, 10), Z = 3.25, k = 10].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    No significant correlations or group differences in correlation between shift cost and activation in the left or right inferior frontal gyrus were found.

    “No significant correlations in either group and no significant group differences in correlation between shift cost and activation in either the left or right inferior frontal gyrus were found.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    No group differences were detected in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex at the a priori threshold or any additional region at the FWE-corrected threshold.

    “Group differences were not detected in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and ACC at our a priori significance threshold or any additional region at the FWE-corrected threshold.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the HC group, right caudate activation during set-shifting was positively correlated with shift cost; in the OCD group, it was negatively correlated.

    “in that we found a positive correlation in HC and a negative correlation in OCD.”
    • Also stated in: § Imaging Data · plain
      “The HC group showed a positive correlation (Pearson's r = 0.53, p < .02) and the OCD group showed a negative correlation (Pearson's r = 0.61, p < .02) between shift cost and percent signal change values in this region.”
    • Also stated in: § Imaging Data · plain
      “In other words, as the shift cost increased, the right caudate activation increased in the HC group and decreased in the OCD group”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There were no significant main effects or group × condition interactions for reaction time on correct trials.

    “No significant main effects or group × condition interactions for reaction time on correct trials were noted (all p > .2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the current study, accuracy rates in both groups were quite high, and most errors occurred within the first trials of the block.

    “In the current study, accuracy rates in both groups were quite high, and most errors occurred within the first trials of the block”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The HC group activated both the putamen and caudate in these contrasts, but the OCD group did not activate these regions in either contrast.

    “Specifically, the HC group activated both the putamen and caudate in these contrasts, but the OCD group did not activate these regions in either contrast.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The final study sample included 15 individuals with OCD and 20 healthy comparison subjects, matched for age, gender, and handedness.

    “The final study sample included 15 individuals with OCD and 20 HC subjects, matched for age, gender, and handedness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Statistical significance was based on both a peak threshold and a spatial extent threshold that corrects for multiple comparisons to p < .05.

    “Statistical significance was based on both a peak threshold and a spatial extent threshold that corrects for multiple comparisons to a level of p < .05.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The left inferior frontal gyrus may maintain cognitive sets.

    “The left inferior frontal gyrus may maintain the cognitive sets,38-41”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [38] Aron, 2004, A componential analysis of task-switching deficits associated with lesions of left and right frontal cortex, Brain source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [39] Aron, 2004, Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex, Trends Cogn Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [40] Garavan, 2002, Dissociable executive functions in the dynamic control of behavior: inhibition, error detection, and correction, Neuroimage source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [41] MacDonald, 2000, Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control, Science source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The study used a priori regions of interest (OFC, inferior frontal gyrus, striatal, hippocampal) based on previous literature.

    “Based on previous literature on task-switching, set-shifting, and implicit learning tasks,6,19,29,30 we examined group interaction effects in the frontal cortical (OFC, inferior frontal gyrus), striatal, and hippocampal regions, as a priori regions of interest (ROIs).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [6] Gu, 2008, Neural correlates of cognitive inflexibility during task-switching in obsessive-compulsive disorder, Brain source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [19] Casey, 2004, Early development of subcortical regions involved in non-cued attention switching, Dev Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [29] Rauch, 1997, Probing striatal function in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a PET study of implicit sequence learning, J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [30] Rauch, 2007, Functional magnetic resonance imaging study of regional brain activation during implicit sequence learning in obsessive-compulsive disorder, Biol Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The set-shifting task used examines cognitive flexibility.

    “The task, requiring an extradimensional shift to identify a target, examines cognitive flexibility.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] Casey, 2004, Early development of subcortical regions involved in non-cued attention switching, Dev Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation

    In neuroimaging studies, boys with OCD showed less caudate and orbitofrontal cortex activation in response to successful inhibition during a stop/signal task than healthy boys.

    “as well as less caudate and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) activation in response to successful inhibition during a stop/signal task.18”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] Woolley, 2008, Brain activation in paediatric obsessive compulsive disorder during tasks of inhibitory control, Br J Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    No subjects were excluded for excessive head movement.

    “None of the subjects were excluded for excessive head movement (3-mm translational movement or 1.5° rotation in any direction).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Adults with OCD have deficits in cognitive flexibility and response inhibition.

    “Numerous studies demonstrate that adults with OCD have deficits in cognitive flexibility and response inhibition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 7 sources checked
    • cites [2] Kuelz, 2004, Neuropsychological performance in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a critical review, Biol Psychol source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [3] Lawrence, 2006, Decision making and set shifting impairments are associated with distinct symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder, Neuropsychology source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [4] Bannon, 2006, Executive functions in obsessive-compulsive disorder: state or trait deficits?, Aust N Z J Psychiatry

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [5] Remijnse, 2006, Reduced orbitofrontal-striatal activity on a reversal learning task in obsessive-compulsive disorder, Arch Gen Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [10] Penades, 2007, Impaired response inhibition in obsessive compulsive disorder, Eur Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [11] Bannon, 2002, Response inhibition deficits in obsessive-compulsive disorder, Psychiatry Res source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [12] Rosenberg, 1997, Response-inhibition deficits in obsessive-compulsive disorder: an indicator of dysfunction in frontostriatal circuits, J Psychiatry Neurosci

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The lack of left inferior frontal activation in the OCD group during mixed blocks, together with their tendency toward greater shift costs, suggests that the OCD group may have difficulty shifting cognitive sets because of a failure to activate the left inferior frontal gyrus.

    “The lack of left inferior frontal activation in the OCD group during mixed blocks, coupled with the patients' tendency toward greater shift costs, suggest that the OCD group may have difficulty shifting cognitive sets because of a failure to activate the left inferior frontal gyrus.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Bilateral inferior frontal gyrus activations have been reported during set-shifting.

    “Bilateral inferior frontal gyrus activations have been reported during set-shifting.35-37”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [35] Dove, 2000, Prefrontal cortex activation in task switching: an event-related fMRI study, Brain Res Cogn Brain Res source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [36] Monchi, 2001, Wisconsin Card Sorting revisited: distinct neural circuits participating in different stages of the task identified by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging, J Neurosci source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [37] Nakahara, 2002, Functional MRI of macaque monkeys performing a cognitive set-shifting task, Science source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The left inferior frontal gyrus may be recruited to successfully shift cognitive sets.

    “Generally, the left inferior frontal gyrus may be recruited to successfully shift cognitive sets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The final sample was obtained after excluding data from four OCD and one HC participant for poor behavioral response and one HC participant for technical problems.

    “This final sample was obtained after data from participants were excluded for poor behavioral response (four OCD, one HC) and technical problems (one HC).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Fronto-striatal circuitry hyperactivity has been detected in Tourette's disorder patients, which is contrary to our finding.

    “Fronto-striatal circuitry hyperactivity has been detected in Tourette's disorder patients,55,56 which is contrary to our finding”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [55] Baym, 2008, Neural correlates of tic severity and cognitive control in children with Tourette syndrome, Brain source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [56] Marsh, 2007, A developmental fMRI study of self-regulatory control in Tourette's syndrome, Am J Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Other studies suggest that medication effects from SSRIs may reduce frontal and striatal activation during OCD symptom provocation.

    “However, other studies suggest that medication effects from SSRIs may reduce frontal and striatal activation during OCD symptom provocation.51”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51] Nakao, 2005, Brain activation of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder during neuropsychological and symptom provocation tasks before and after symptom improvement: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study, Biol Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Several studies have suggested the importance of examining the different OCD symptom profiles separately.

    “Several studies have suggested the importance of examining the different OCD symptom profiles separately3,30”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] Lawrence, 2006, Decision making and set shifting impairments are associated with distinct symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder, Neuropsychology source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [30] Rauch, 2007, Functional magnetic resonance imaging study of regional brain activation during implicit sequence learning in obsessive-compulsive disorder, Biol Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Some studies have reported that the neuropsychological deficits in executive functioning are attributable to comorbid depressive symptoms.

    “Some studies have reported that the neuropsychological deficits in executive functioning are attributable to comorbid depressive symptoms.53”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [53] Purcell, 1998, Neuropsychological deficits in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a comparison with unipolar depression, panic disorder, and normal controls, Arch Gen Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The group difference in correlation may be explained by the activation of different neuronal populations within the caudate.

    “The group difference in correlation may be explained by the activation of different neuronal populations within the caudate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The left inferior frontal gyrus may resolve interference from previous trials in working memory tasks.

    “resolve interference from previous trials in working memory tasks.44”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44] D'Esposito, 1999, The neural substrate and temporal dynamics of interference effects in working memory as revealed by event-related functional MRI, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Contemporary neurocircuitry models of OCD emphasize a potential imbalance between the mutually antagonistic direct and indirect cortico-striatal-thalamic pathways.

    “Contemporary neurocircuitry models of OCD emphasize a potential imbalance between the mutually antagonistic direct and indirect cortico-striatal-thalamic pathways.47”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [47] Saxena, 1998, Neuroimaging and frontal-subcortical circuitry in obsessive-compulsive disorder, Br J Psychiatry Suppl source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The group difference in correlation may be explained by the multiple discrete cell types in the striatum that cannot be readily discriminated using fMRI imaging methods.

    “The group difference in correlation also may be explained by the multiple discrete cell types in the striatum that cannot be readily discriminated using fMRI imaging methods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The left inferior frontal gyrus may mediate cognitive shift.

    “mediate the cognitive shift,42,43”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [42] Derrfuss, 2005, Involvement of the inferior frontal junction in cognitive control: meta-analyses of switching and Stroop studies, Hum Brain Mapp source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [43] Konishi, 2002, Hemispheric asymmetry in human lateral prefrontal cortex during cognitive set shifting, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Some studies have suggested that medication may not influence cognitive function or group differences in activation.

    “Some studies have suggested that medication may not influence cognitive function or group differences in activation.6,50”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [6] Gu, 2008, Neural correlates of cognitive inflexibility during task-switching in obsessive-compulsive disorder, Brain source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [50] Mataix-Cols, 2002, Neuropsychological performance in medicated versus unmedicated patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, Psychiatry Res source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Developmental effects may explain the lack of striatal group differences.

    “Alternatively, developmental effects may explain the lack of striatal group differences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The right inferior frontal gyrus may facilitate successful response inhibition.

    “On the other hand, the right inferior frontal gyrus may facilitate successful response inhibition.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The right inferior frontal gyrus has been implicated in tasks requiring response inhibition or task-switching when stimulus-response mappings change.

    “The right inferior frontal gyrus has been implicated in tasks that require responses inhibition (e.g., during go/no go tasks) or taskswitching when stimulus–response mappings change.38”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] Aron, 2004, A componential analysis of task-switching deficits associated with lesions of left and right frontal cortex, Brain source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Extradimensional shift deficits may represent a possible endophenotype, as first-degree relatives of females with OCD who have contamination symptoms have demonstrated similar deficits.

    “Extradimensional shift deficits may represent a possible endophenotype, as first-degree relatives of females with OCD who have contamination symptoms have demonstrated similar deficits.7”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Chamberlain, 2006, Motor inhibition and cognitive flexibility in obsessive-compulsive disorder and trichotillomania, Am J Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Work in ADHD has found reductions in frontal regions during response inhibition tasks.

    “however, work in ADHD has found reductions in frontal regions during response inhibition tasks.57”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] Smith, 2006, Task-specific hypoactivation in prefrontal and temporoparietal brain regions during motor inhibition and task switching in medication-naive children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Am J Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    There is some evidence that antidepressants enhance right inferior prefrontal activation during inhibitory tasks.

    “In addition, there is some evidence that antidepressants enhance right inferior prefrontal activation during inhibitory tasks.52”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [52] Vollm, 2006, Serotonergic modulation of neuronal responses to behavioural inhibition and reinforcing stimuli: an fMRI study in healthy volunteers, Eur J Neurosci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is expected that the group differences found in this study with a medicated OCD sample would be more pronounced in drug-naive patients.

    “and it is expected that the group differences found in this study with a medicated OCD sample would be more pronounced in drug-naive patients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Group differences between HC and OCD groups in set-shifting may emerge at a later time point along the brain's developmental trajectory.

    “Group differences between HC and OCD groups in set-shifting may emerge at a later time point along the brain's developmental trajectory”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The sample did contain individuals with comorbid diagnoses of Tourette's disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

    “Finally, our sample did contain individuals with comorbid diagnoses of Tourette's disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Gu et al. reported less inferior frontal gyrus activation during task-switching in adults with OCD and show that this effect is independent of medication status.

    “In particular, Gu et al. reported less inferior frontal gyrus activation during task-switching in adults with OCD and show that this effect is independent of medication status.6”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Gu, 2008, Neural correlates of cognitive inflexibility during task-switching in obsessive-compulsive disorder, Brain source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Both the behavioral and functional activation group differences are highly relevant to the disorder's symptoms, suggesting that deficits in shifting cognitive sets are linked to less inferior frontal gyrus and striatal activation.

    “Both the behavioral and functional activation group differences are highly relevant to the disorder's symptoms, suggesting that deficits in shifting cognitive sets are linked to less inferior frontal gyrus and striatal activation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The functional activation patterns may be dependent on developmental stage.

    “Finally, the functional activation patterns may be dependent on developmental stage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    As IQ measures were not obtained from this sample, we cannot address whether IQ differences affected the group differences in functional activation.

    “As IQ measures were not obtained from this sample, we cannot address whether IQ differences affected the group differences in functional activation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationown data

    Results from this study provide new insight into the neural correlates of cognitive flexibility deficits in pediatric OCD.

    “In summary, results from this study provide new insight into the neural correlates of cognitive flexibility deficits in pediatric OCD.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: No prior study has examined set-shifting in pediatric OCD.
44 of 44
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    OCD symptoms may arise from an inability to shift cognitive sets or inhibit repetitive behaviors.

    “symptoms that may arise from the inability to shift cognitive sets or to inhibit repetitive behaviors.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Task-switching paradigms involve shifting both cognitive tasks and motor response mappings.

    “The task-switching paradigms involve shifting both cognitive tasks and motor response mappings”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The set-shifting task isolates cognitive shifting deficits from motor response shifts.

    “additional neuroimaging studies in pediatric OCD are needed to investigate neural correlates of cognitive flexibility isolating deficits during cognitive from motor shifts.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No prior study has examined set-shifting in pediatric OCD.

    “To the authors' knowledge, this study represents the first attempt to study set-shifting in pediatric OCD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Block designs have greater statistical power than event-related designs to detect differences.

    “Compared with event-related designs, block designs have increased statistical power to detect differences.”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Probabilistic reversal learning tasks have often been used to test cognitive flexibility.

    “To test cognitive flexibility, probabilistic reversal learning tasks have often been used (e.g., Adleman et al., 2011; Britton et al., 2010; Clarke et al., 2004; Klanker et al., 2013; van der Plasse and Feenstra, 2008; Xue et al., 2013).”
  • Children with OCD, compared with controls, have reduced orbitofrontal cortex activation during set shifting, with no differences in the striatum, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

    “Children with OCD, relative to controls, had decreased OFC activation during set shifting, but there were no differences in the striatum, dmPFC, or dlPFC.”

    From Neural Substrates of Childhood Anxiety Disorders (2012) · cites this paper as [162]

  • Caudate activation is positively correlated with a behavioral measure of cognitive flexibility in healthy controls, but negatively correlated in children with OCD.

    “Caudate activation was positively correlated with a behavioral measure cognitive flexibility in healthy controls, but negatively correlated in OCD.”

    From Neural Substrates of Childhood Anxiety Disorders (2012) · cites this paper as [162]

  • Children with OCD have larger gray-matter volume in the orbitofrontal cortex.

    “Larger gray-matter volume has also been reported in the OFC162,166”

    From Neural Substrates of Childhood Anxiety Disorders (2012) · cites this paper as [162]

  • Children with OCD show differences in the inferior frontal gyrus.

    “Other PFC areas that show differences in OCD include the medial frontal gyrus162,167 and inferior frontal gyrus.162”

    From Neural Substrates of Childhood Anxiety Disorders (2012) · cites this paper as [162]

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • ConsistentF(2, 66) = 12.1reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(2, 66) = 12.1, p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(6, 198) = 3reported p < .03 · recomputed p = .008

    “F(6, 198) = 3.0, p < .03”

  • ConsistentF(3, 99) = 22.2reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(3, 99) = 22.2, p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(1, 33) = 3.6reported p < .07 · recomputed p = .067

    “F(1, 33) = 3.6, p < .07”

4 of 4

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Britton, J. C., Rauch, S. L., Rosso, I. M., Killgore, W. D. S., Price, L. M., Ragan, J., Chosak, A., Hezel, D. M., Pine, D. S., Leibenluft, E., Pauls, D. L., Jenike, M. A., & Stewart, S. E.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
  • McLean Hospital (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Stewart, S. Evelyn
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
49
Issue
9
Pages
944-953
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2147831701
Cited by
92
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • McLean Hospital
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS016648)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder, cognitive flexibility, set-shifting, response inhibition, frontostriatal circuits, inferior frontal gyrus, neural correlates, developing brain
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention, Brain Mapping, Caudate Nucleus, Child, Cognition, Color Perception, Corpus Striatum, Dominance, Cerebral, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Reference Values, Reversal Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review