The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The spinal biology in humans and animals of pain states generated by persistent small afferent input
Open accessAbstract
Behavioral models indicate that persistent small afferent input, as generated by tissue injury, results in a hyperalgesia at the site of injury and a tactile allodynia in areas adjacent to the injury site. Hyperalgesia reflects a sensitization of the peripheral terminal and a central facilitation evoked by the persistent small afferent input. The allodynia reflects a central sensitization. The spinal pharmacology of these pain states has been defined in the unanesthetized rat prepared with spinal catheters for injection and dialysis. After tissue injury, excitatory transmitters (e.g., glutamate and substance P) acting though N- methyl- d -aspartate (NMDA) and neurokinin 1 receptors initiate a cascade that evokes release of ( i ) NO, ( ii ) cyclooxygenase products, and ( iii ) activation of several kinases. Spinal dialysis show amino acid and prostanoid release after cutaneous injury. Spinal neurokinin 1, NMDA, and non-NMDA receptors enhance spinal prostaglandin E2 release. Spinal prostaglandins facilitate release of spinal amino acids and peptides. Activation by intrathecal injection of receptors on spinal C fiber terminals (μ,/∂ opiate, α2 adrenergic, neuropeptide Y) prevents release of primary afferent peptides and spinal amino acids and blocks acute and facilitated pain states. Conversely, consistent with their role in facilitated processing, NMDA, cyclooxygenase 2, and NO synthase inhibitors act to diminish only hyperalgesia. Importantly, spinal delivery of several of these agents diminishes human injury pain states. This efficacy emphasizes ( i ) the role of facilitated states in humans, ( ii ) shows the importance of spinal systems in human pain processing, and ( iii ) indicates that these preclinical mechanisms reflect processes that regulate the human pain experience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The amygdala and persistent pain
Neugebauer, V., Li, W., Bird, G. C., & Han, J. S. (2004) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858403261077 · Cited by 719
Bronchopulmonary afferent nerves.
CARR, M. J., & UNDEM, B. J. (2003) · Respirology · doi:10.1046/j.1440-1843.2003.00473.x · Cited by 147
Hama (2009) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2008.04.0049 · Cited by 32
Effect of Aspirin and Acetaminophen on Proinflammatory Cytokine-Induced Pain Behavior in Mice
Kwon, M.-S., Shim, E.-J., Seo, Y.-J., Choi, S.-S., Lee, J.-Y., Lee, H.-K., & Suh, H.-W. (2005) · Pharmacology · doi:10.1159/000084548 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Yaksh, T. L., Hua, X.-Y., Kalcheva, I., Nozaki-Taguchi, N., & Marsala, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-07-06
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 7680-7686
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2029850759
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The spinal biology in humans and animals of pain states generated by persistent small afferent input. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.14.7680
- The paper
- Yaksh, T. L., Hua, X.-Y., Kalcheva, I., Nozaki-Taguchi, N., & Marsala, M. (1999). The spinal biology in humans and animals of pain states generated by persistent small afferent input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.14.7680
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.