Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 415

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential acute and chronic responses of tumor necrosis factor-deficient mice to experimental brain injury

Open access
Scherbel, Uwe, Raghupathi, Ramesh, Nakamura, Michio, Saatman, Kathryn E., Trojanowski, John Q., Neugebauer, Edmund, Marino, Michael W., McIntosh, Tracy K.·1999·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The present study evaluated behavioral and histopathological outcome after controlled cortical impact (CCI) brain injury in mice deficient in tumor necrosis factor [TNF(−/−)] and their wild-type (wt) littermates. Mice were subjected to CCI brain injury [TNF(−/−),n= 10; wt,n= 10] or served as uninjured controls [TNF(−/−),n= 10; wt,n= 10] and were evaluated for deficits in memory retention at 7 days postinjury. Although both brain-injured wt and TNF(−/−) mice exhibited significant memory dysfunction compared to uninjured controls (P< 0.02), the deficits in memory retention in injured TNF(−/−) mice were significantly less severe than in injured wt mice (P< 0.02). A second group of mice was subjected to CCI brain injury [TNF(−/−),n= 20; wt,n= 20] or served as uninjured controls [TNF(−/−),n= 15; wt,n= 15] and were evaluated over a 4-week period for neurological motor function. In the acute posttraumatic period (48 h postinjury), brain-injured TNF(−/−) mice were significantly less impaired than injured wt mice on composite neuroscore (P< 0.001), rotarod (P< 0.05), and beam balance (P< 0.02) tests. However, wt mice recovered from brain injury by 2–3 weeks postinjury, whereas TNF(−/−) mice continued to demonstrate persistent motor deficits up to 4 weeks postinjury. Histopathological analysis at 2 and 4 weeks postinjury revealed that brain-injured TNF(−/−) mice had significantly more cortical tissue loss than wt mice (P< 0.02). Our results suggest that although the presence of TNF in the acute posttraumatic period may be deleterious, this cytokine may play a role in facilitating long-term behavioral recovery and histological repair after brain injury.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8721

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 415

Metadata

Authors
Scherbel, U., Raghupathi, R., Nakamura, M., Saatman, K. E., Trojanowski, J. Q., Neugebauer, E., Marino, M. W., & McIntosh, T. K.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1999-07-20
Volume
96
Issue
15
Pages
8721-8726
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2017676785
Cited by
415
References
4
FWCI
15.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential acute and chronic responses of tumor necrosis factor-deficient mice to experimental brain injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.15.8721
The paper
Scherbel, U., Raghupathi, R., Nakamura, M., Saatman, K. E., Trojanowski, J. Q., Neugebauer, E., Marino, M. W., & McIntosh, T. K. (1999). Differential acute and chronic responses of tumor necrosis factor-deficient mice to experimental brain injury. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.15.8721

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.