Cited by 624Evolution and Genetic DynamicsLanguage and cultural evolutionAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Evolutionary consequences of niche construction and their implications for ecology

Open access
Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, F. J., Feldman, M. W.·1999·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Organisms regularly modify local resource distributions, influencing both their ecosystems and the evolution of traits whose fitness depends on such alterable sources of natural selection in environments. We call these processes niche construction. We explore the evolutionary consequences of niche construction using a two-locus population genetic model, which extends earlier analyses by allowing resource distributions to be influenced both by niche construction and by independent processes of renewal and depletion. The analysis confirms that niche construction can be a potent evolutionary agent by generating selection that leads to the fixation of otherwise deleterious alleles, supporting stable polymorphisms where none are expected, eliminating what would otherwise be stable polymorphisms, and generating unusual evolutionary dynamics. Even small amounts of niche construction, or niche construction that only weakly affects resource dynamics, can significantly alter both ecological and evolutionary patterns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10242

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modeling NC as a process that changes the capacity of the environment is common and finds inspiration in natural behaviors, such as nest-constructing species.

    “Modeling NC as a process that changes the capacity of the environment is common (Laland et al., 1999;Krakauer et al., 2009) and finds inspiration in natural behaviors, such as nest-constructing species.”
  • NC studies were at first primarily theoretical, employing differential equations to predict how NC affects evolution.

    “NC studies were at first primarily theoretical, employing differential equations to predict how NC affects evolution (Laland et al., 1999;Krakauer et al., 2009).”
  • Previous studies have primarily modeled NC in two different ways: as an increase in the amount of resources that increases the environment's capacity and as a direct increase or decrease in fitness that does not affect capacity.

    “Previous studies have primarily modeled NC in two different ways: as an increase in the amount of resources that increases the environment's capacity (Laland et al., 1999;Krakauer et al., 2009) and as a direct increase or decrease in fitness that does not affect capacity (Suzuki and Arita, 2009).”
  • NC can emerge without direct selection.

    “Such models lent intuitive insights, such that NC can emerge without direct selection (Laland et al., 1999) and that the ability to monopolize niches enables the emergence of NC (Krakauer et al., 2009) but come with limitations, such as the fact that niches are identical and agents are not plastic.”
  • Such models come with limitations, such as the fact that niches are identical and agents are not plastic.

    “Such models lent intuitive insights, such that NC can emerge without direct selection (Laland et al., 1999) and that the ability to monopolize niches enables the emergence of NC (Krakauer et al., 2009) but come with limitations, such as the fact that niches are identical and agents are not plastic.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, F. J., & Feldman, M. W.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1999-08-31
Volume
96
Issue
18
Pages
10242-10247
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2089938084
Cited by
624
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 23
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM28016, R01GM028016)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
niche construction, evolutionary implications, resource allocation, stable polymorphism, evolutionary dynamics, local adaptation
MeSH terms
Alleles, Diploidy, Ecology, Biological Evolution, Genotype, Heterozygote, Models, Genetic, Polymorphism, Genetic, Models, Statistical, Ecosystem, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review