The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Frontiers of finance: Evolution and efficient markets
Open accessAbstract
In this review article, we explore several recent advances in the quantitative modeling of financial markets. We begin with the Efficient Markets Hypothesis and describe how this controversial idea has stimulated a number of new directions of research, some focusing on more elaborate mathematical models that are capable of rationalizing the empirical facts, others taking a completely different tack in rejecting rationality altogether. One of the most promising directions is to view financial markets from a biological perspective and, specifically, within an evolutionary framework in which markets, instruments, institutions, and investors interact and evolve dynamically according to the “law” of economic selection. Under this view, financial agents compete and adapt, but they do not necessarily do so in an optimal fashion. Evolutionary and ecological models of financial markets is truly a new frontier whose exploration has just begun.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II
Arthur, W. B. (2018) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780429496639 · Cited by 2,313
Evolutionary Games in Economics
Friedman, D. (1991) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2938222 · Cited by 1,939
Advances in Behavioral Finance.
Jegadeesh, N., & Thaler, R. H. (1995) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2329257 · Cited by 775
A non-random walk down Wall Street
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-2272 · Cited by 647
Anderson, P. W. (2018) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780429492846 · Cited by 353
The Three P's of Total Risk Management
Lo, A. W. (1999) · Financial Analysts Journal · doi:10.2469/faj.v55.n1.2238 · Cited by 152
Self-citation
Cited by
The evolution of stock market efficiency over time: A survey of the empirical literature
Lim, K.-P., & Brooks, R. (2011) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00611.x · Cited by 410
Deep learning and time series-to-image encoding for financial forecasting
Barra, S., Carta, S. M., Corriga, A., Podda, A. S., & Recupero, D. R. (2020) · IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica · doi:10.1109/jas.2020.1003132 · Cited by 267
Brain Activity Foreshadows Stock Price Dynamics
Stallen, M., Borg, N., & Knutson, B. (2021) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1727-20.2021 · Cited by 18
Periodicity, Elliott waves, and fractals in the NFT market
Christopher Westland, J. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-55011-x · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Farmer, J. D., & Lo, A. W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-08-31
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 9991-9992
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2130360577
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 12.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frontiers of finance: Evolution and efficient markets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.18.9991
- The paper
- Farmer, J. D., & Lo, A. W. (1999). Frontiers of finance: Evolution and efficient markets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.18.9991
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.