The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical relevance of the Helicobacter pylori gene for blood-group antigen-binding adhesin
Open accessAbstract
Infection with Helicobacter pylori is associated with different human gastric diseases. Biochemical studies, in vitro adherence assays, and in vivo animal models revealed that epithelial attachment of H. pylori can be mediated by the blood-group antigen-binding adhesin (BabA) targeting human Lewis b surface epitopes. Studies with transgenic mice expressing the Lewis b epitope have shown that such attachment can alter disease outcome. In the current study, the presence of the babA2 gene encoding the adhesin was investigated in clinical isolates from a German population by using PCR and reverse transcription–PCR. A positive genotype was correlated to allelic variations in the genes encoding VacA and CagA and also to the prevalence of duodenal ulcer, distal gastric adenocarcinoma, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, and antral gastritis. The presence of babA2 was significantly associated with duodenal ulcer ( P = 0.0002) and adenocarcinoma ( P = 0.033). In contrast, type 1 strains ( vacAs1- and cagA -positive) were associated with only duodenal ulcer ( P = 0.004) but not adenocarcinoma ( P = 0.235). Genotype presence of babA2 , vacAs1 , and cagA (“triple-positive” strains) showed a highly significant correlation to the prevalence of ulcer ( P = 0.000002) and adenocarcinoma ( P = 0.014) and discriminated significantly better between disease outcome than did the current type 1 classification. These results indicate that the babA2 gene is of high clinical relevance and would be a useful marker to identify patients who are at higher risk for specific H. pylori- related diseases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Alm, R. A., Ling, L.-S. L., Moir, D. T., King, B. L., Brown, E. D., Doig, P. C., Smith, D. R., Noonan, B., Guild, B. C., deJonge, B. L., et al. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/16495 · Cited by 1,893
Cited by
Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori Infection
Kusters, J. G., van Vliet, A. H. M., & Kuipers, E. J. (2006) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00054-05 · Cited by 2,526
Helicobacter pylori: gastric cancer and beyond
Polk, D. B., & Peek, R. M. (2010) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2857 · Cited by 1,158
Helicobacter pylori infection: An overview of bacterial virulence factors and pathogenesis
Kao, C.-Y., Sheu, B.-S., & Wu, J.-J. (2016) · Biomedical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bj.2015.06.002 · Cited by 513
Metadata
- Authors
- Gerhard, M., Lehn, N., Neumayer, N., Borén, T., Rad, R., Schepp, W., Miehlke, S., Classen, M., & Prinz, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-10-26
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 12778-12783
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1990896685
- Cited by
- 610
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical relevance of the Helicobacter pylori gene for blood-group antigen-binding adhesin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.22.12778
- The paper
- Gerhard, M., Lehn, N., Neumayer, N., Borén, T., Rad, R., Schepp, W., Miehlke, S., Classen, M., & Prinz, C. (1999). Clinical relevance of the Helicobacter pylori gene for blood-group antigen-binding adhesin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.22.12778
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.