The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement of community metabolism and significance in the coral reef CO 2 source-sink debate
Open accessAbstract
Two methods are commonly used to measure the community metabolism (primary production, respiration, and calcification) of shallow-water marine communities and infer air–sea CO 2 fluxes: the pH-total alkalinity and pH-O 2 techniques. The underlying assumptions of each technique are examined to assess the recent claim that the most widely used technique in coral reefs (pH-total alkalinity), may have provided spurious results in the past because of high rates of nitrification and release of phosphoric acid in the water column [Chisholm, J. R. M. & Barnes, D. J. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6566–6569]. At least three lines of evidence suggest that this claim is not founded. First, the rate of nitrification required to explain the discrepancy between the two methods recently reported is not realistic as it is much higher than the rates measured in another reef system and greater than the highest rate measured in a marine environment. Second, fluxes of ammonium, nitrate, and phosphorus are not consistent with high rates of nitrification and release of phosphoric acid. Third, the consistency of the metabolic parameters obtained by using the two techniques is in good agreement in two sites recently investigated. The pH-total alkalinity technique therefore appears to be applicable in most coral reef systems. Consequently, the conclusion that most coral reef flats are sources of CO 2 to the atmosphere does not need revision. Furthermore, we provide geochemical evidence that calcification in coral reefs, as well as in other calcifying ecosystems, is a long-term source of CO 2 for the atmosphere.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Berner, R. A., Lasaga, A. C., & Garrels, R. M. (1983) · American Journal of Science · doi:10.2475/ajs.283.7.641 · Cited by 2,428
Cited by
Do we have enough pieces of the jigsaw to integrate CO2 fluxes in the coastal ocean?
Borges, A. V. (2005) · Estuaries · doi:10.1007/bf02732750 · Cited by 414
Biomineralisation in reef-building corals: from molecular mechanisms to environmental control
Allemand, D., Ferrier-Pagès, C., Furla, P., Houlbrèque, F., Puverel, S., Reynaud, S., Tambutté, É., Tambutté, S., & Zoccola, D. (2004) · Comptes Rendus Palevol · doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2004.07.011 · Cited by 386
Coral reefs may start dissolving when atmospheric CO2 doubles
Silverman, J., Lazar, B., Cao, L., Caldeira, K., & Erez, J. (2009) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2008gl036282 · Cited by 328
The effect of biogeochemical processes on pH
Soetaert, K., Hofmann, A. F., Middelburg, J. J., Meysman, F. J. R., & Greenwood, J. (2007) · Marine Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.marchem.2006.12.012 · Cited by 295
Legendre, L., Rivkin, R. B., Weinbauer, M. G., Guidi, L., & Uitz, J. (2015) · Progress In Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2015.01.008 · Cited by 215
Metadata
- Authors
- Gattuso, J.-P., Frankignoulle, M., & Smith, S. V.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-11-09
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 13017-13022
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2039491547
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement of community metabolism and significance in the coral reef CO 2 source-sink debate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.23.13017
- The paper
- Gattuso, J.-P., Frankignoulle, M., & Smith, S. V. (1999). Measurement of community metabolism and significance in the coral reef CO 2 source-sink debate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.23.13017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.