The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Targeted disruption of gene function in Drosophila by RNA interference (RNA-i): A role for nautilus in embryonic somatic muscle formation
Open accessAbstract
The expression of the MyoD gene homolog, nautilus (nau), in the Drosophila embryo defines a subset of mesodermal cells known as the muscle “pioneer” or “founder” cells. These cells are thought to establish the future muscle pattern in each hemisegment. Founders appear to recruit fusion-competent mesodermal cells to establish a particular muscle fiber type. In support of this concept every somatic muscle in the embryo is associated with one or more nautilus -positive cells. However, because of the lack of known (isolated) nautilus mutations, no direct test of the founder cell hypothesis has been possible. We now have utilized toxin ablation and genetic interference by double-stranded RNA (RNA interference or RNA-i) to determine both the role of the nautilus -expressing cells and the nautilus gene, respectively, in embryonic muscle formation. In the absence of nautilus -expressing cells muscle formation is severely disrupted or absent. A similar phenotype is observed with the elimination of the nautilus gene product by genetic interference upon injection of nautilus double-stranded RNA. These results define a crucial role for nautilus in embryonic muscle formation. The application of RNA interference to a variety of known Drosophila mutations as controls gave phenotypes essentially indistinguishable from the original mutation. RNA-i provides a powerful approach for the targeted disruption of a given genetic function in Drosophila .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans
Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M. K., Kostas, S. A., Driver, S. E., & Mello, C. C. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35888 · Cited by 15,429
The MyoD family and myogenesis: Redundancy, networks, and thresholds
Weintraub, H. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90610-3 · Cited by 1,057
Cited by
RNA Interference: Biology, Mechanism, and Applications
Agrawal, N., Dasaradhi, P. V. N., Mohmmed, A., Malhotra, P., Bhatnagar, R. K., & Mukherjee, S. K. (2003) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.67.4.657-685.2003 · Cited by 1,305
Clemens, J. C., Worby, C. A., Simonson-Leff, N., Muda, M., Maehama, T., Hemmings, B. A., & Dixon, J. E. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.110149597 · Cited by 843
Delivery of dsRNA for RNAi in insects: an overview and future directions
Yu, N., Christiaens, O., Liu, J., Niu, J., Cappelle, K., Caccia, S., Huvenne, H., & Smagghe, G. (2013) · Insect Science · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01534.x · Cited by 375
Gene silencing by double-stranded RNA
Carthew, R. W. (2001) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/s0955-0674(00)00204-0 · Cited by 285
Evolutionary Conservation of MyoD Function and Differential Utilization of E Proteins
Zhang, J.-M., Chen, L., Krause, M., Fire, A., & Paterson, B. M. (1999) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1006/dbio.1999.9218 · Cited by 42
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Misquitta, L., & Paterson, B. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-02-16
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1451-1456
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2093008096
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Targeted disruption of gene function in Drosophila by RNA interference (RNA-i): A role for nautilus in embryonic somatic muscle formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.4.1451
- The paper
- Misquitta, L., & Paterson, B. M. (1999). Targeted disruption of gene function in Drosophila by RNA interference (RNA-i): A role for nautilus in embryonic somatic muscle formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.4.1451
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.