Cited by 520

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Potent and nontoxic antisense oligonucleotides containing locked nucleic acids

Wahlestedt, Claes, Salmi, Peter, Good, Liam, Kela, Johanna, Johnsson, Thomas, Hökfelt, Tomas, Broberger, Christian, Porreca, Frank, Lai, Josephine, Ren, Kunkun, Ossipov, Michael, Koshkin, Alexei, Jakobsen, Nana, Skouv, Jan, Oerum, Henrik, Jacobsen, Mogens Havsteen, Wengel, Jesper·2000·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Insufficient efficacy and/or specificity of antisense oligonucleotides limit their in vivo usefulness. We demonstrate here that a high-affinity DNA analog, locked nucleic acid (LNA), confers several desired properties to antisense agents. Unlike DNA, LNA/DNA copolymers were not degraded readily in blood serum and cell extracts. However, like DNA, the LNA/DNA copolymers were capable of activating RNase H, an important antisense mechanism of action. In contrast to phosphorothioate-containing oligonucleotides, isosequential LNA analogs did not cause detectable toxic reactions in rat brain. LNA/DNA copolymers exhibited potent antisense activity on assay systems as disparate as a G-protein-coupled receptor in living rat brain and an Escherichia coli reporter gene. LNA-containing oligonucleotides will likely be useful for many antisense applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.97.10.5633

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. C Wahlestedt, L Good Curr Opin Drug Disc Dev 2, 142–146 (1999).
  2. 10.1016/S0968-0004(97)01155-9 · DOI
  3. 10.1089/oli.1.1998.8.vii · DOI
  4. 10.2165/00003495-199957030-00010 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S1367-5931(98)80129-4 · DOI
  6. 10.1159/000028665 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0169-328X(98)00185-5 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/anie.199314321 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0040-4039(94)85212-X · DOI
  10. 10.1021/jm960306 · DOI
  11. 10.1021/ja972597x · DOI
  12. 10.1039/a703176i · DOI
  13. 10.1021/ja9743598 · DOI
  14. 10.1039/a708608c · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0040-4020(98)00094-5 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0040-4039(98)01084-3 · DOI
  17. 10.1021/ja9822862 · DOI
  18. 10.1021/ar980051p · DOI
  19. T L Yaksh, T A Rudy J Pharmacol Exp Ther 202, 411–428 (1977).
  20. G Paxinos, C Watson The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates (Academic, London, 1998).
  21. 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00231-3 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0014-2999(94)90758-7 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0169-328X(99)00276-4 · DOI
  24. K A Markey, S Kondo, L Shenkman, M Goldstein Mol Pharmacol 17, 79–85 (1980).
  25. J S Thorson, V W Cornish, J E Barrett, S T Cload, T Yano, P G Schultz Methods Mol Biol 77, 43–73 (1998).
  26. 10.1128/AAC.1.4.283 · DOI
  27. E Uhlmann, A Peyman, D W Will Encyclopedia of Cancer, ed J R Bertino (Academic, San Diego) 1, 64–81 (1997).
  28. E Uhlmann Biol Chem 379, 1045–1052 (1998).
  29. 10.1016/S0958-1669(99)80013-5 · DOI
  30. Bondensgaard K. Petersen M. Singh S. K. Rajwanshi V. K. Wengel J. & Jacobsen J. P. (2000) Chemistry - A European Journal in press.
  31. 10.1126/science.8380941 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/363260a0 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/0165-6147(94)90107-4 · DOI
  34. 10.1089/oli.1.1999.9.105 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90333-6 · DOI
  36. E J Bilsky, R N Bernstein, V J Hruby, R B Rothman, J Lai, F Porreca J Pharmacol Exp Ther 277, 491–501 (1996).
  37. 10.1016/0361-9230(95)02092-6 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/0014-2999(94)90072-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 520

Metadata

Authors
Wahlestedt, C., Salmi, P., Good, L., Kela, J., Johnsson, T., Hökfelt, T., Broberger, C., Porreca, F., Lai, J., Ren, K., Ossipov, M., Koshkin, A., Jakobsen, N., Skouv, J., Oerum, H., Jacobsen, M. H., & Wengel, J.
Affiliations
Center for Genomics Research and Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Pharmacology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724; Exiqon A/S, Copenhagen, DK-2950 Vedbaek, Denmark; Department of Tumor Endocrinology, Institute of Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; and Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2000-05-09
Volume
97
Issue
10
Pages
5633-5638
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
520
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review