The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In vitro cultivation of human islets from expanded ductal tissue
Open accessAbstract
A major obstacle to successful islet transplantation for both type 1 and 2 diabetes is an inadequate supply of insulin-producing tissue. This need for transplantable human islets has stimulated efforts to expand existing pancreatic islets and/or grow new ones. To test the hypothesis that human adult duct tissue could be expanded and differentiated in vitro to form islet cells, digested pancreatic tissue that is normally discarded from eight human islet isolations was cultured under conditions that allowed expansion of the ductal cells as a monolayer whereupon the cells were overlaid with a thin layer of Matrigel. With this manipulation, the monolayer of epithelial cells formed three-dimensional structures of ductal cysts from which 50-to 150-μm diameter islet-like clusters of pancreatic endocrine cells budded. Over 3–4 weeks culture the insulin content per flask increased 10- to 15-fold as the DNA content increased up to 7-fold. The cultivated human islet buds were shown by immunofluorescence to consist of cytokeratin 19-positive duct cells and hormone-positive islet cells. Double staining of insulin and non-β cell hormones in occasional cells indicated immature cells still in the process of differentiation. Insulin secretion studies were done over 24 h in culture. Compared with their basal secretion at 5 mM glucose, cysts/cultivated human islet buds exposed to stimulatory 20 mM glucose had a 2.3-fold increase in secreted insulin. Thus, duct tissue from human pancreas can be expanded in culture and then be directed to differentiate into glucose responsive islet tissue in vitro . This approach may provide a potential new source of pancreatic islet cells for transplantation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells to Insulin-Secreting Structures Similar to Pancreatic Islets
Lumelsky, N., Blondel, O., Laeng, P., Velasco, I., Ravin, R., & McKay, R. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058866 · Cited by 1,453
Multilineage differentiation from human embryonic stem cell lines
Odorico, J. S., Kaufman, D. S., & Thomson, J. A. (2001) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1634/stemcells.19-3-193 · Cited by 969
De Novo Prediction of Stem Cell Identity using Single-Cell Transcriptome Data
Grün, D., Muraro, M. J., Boisset, J.-C., Wiebrands, K., Lyubimova, A., Dharmadhikari, G., van den Born, M., van Es, J., Jansen, E., Clevers, H., et al. (2016) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2016.05.010 · Cited by 586
Nakae, J., Biggs, W. H., Kitamura, T., Cavenee, W. K., Wright, C. V. E., Arden, K. C., & Accili, D. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng890 · Cited by 616
Kitamura, T., Nakae, J., Kitamura, Y., Kido, Y., Biggs, W., Wright, C. V. E., White, M. F., Arden, K. C., & Accili, D. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci16857 · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonner-Weir, S., Taneja, M., Weir, G. C., Tatarkiewicz, K., Song, K.-H., Sharma, A., & O'Neil, J. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-07-05
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 7999-8004
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2146383332
- Cited by
- 978
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 61.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vitro cultivation of human islets from expanded ductal tissue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.97.14.7999
- The paper
- Bonner-Weir, S., Taneja, M., Weir, G. C., Tatarkiewicz, K., Song, K.-H., Sharma, A., & O'Neil, J. J. (2000). In vitro cultivation of human islets from expanded ductal tissue. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.14.7999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.