The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A model for individual and collective cell movement in Dictyostelium discoideum
Open accessAbstract
The cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum is a widely used model system for studying a variety of basic processes in development, including cell–cell signaling, signal transduction, pattern formation, cell motility, and the movement of tissue-like aggregates of cells. Many aspects of cell motion are poorly understood, including how individual cell behavior produces the collective motion of cells observed within the mound and slug. Herein, we describe a biologically realistic model for motile D. discoideum cells that can generate active forces, that interact via surface molecules, and that can detect and respond to chemotactic signals. We model the cells as deformable viscoelastic ellipsoids and incorporate signal transduction and cell–cell signaling by using a previously developed model. The shape constraint restricts the admissible deformations but makes the simulation of a large number of interacting cells feasible. Because the model is based on known processes, the parameters can be estimated or measured experimentally. We show that this model can reproduce the observations on the chemotactic behavior of single cells, streaming during aggregation, and the collective motion of an aggregate of cells driven by a small group of pacemakers. The model predicts that the motion of two-dimensional slugs [Bonner, J. T. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 9355–9359] results from the same behaviors that are exhibited by individual cells; it is not necessary to invoke different mechanisms or behaviors. Our computational experiments also suggest previously uncharacterized phenomena that may be experimentally observable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simulation of biological cell sorting using a two-dimensional extended Potts model
Graner, F., & Glazier, J. A. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2013 · Cited by 1,377
Cited by
A user’s guide to PDE models for chemotaxis
Hillen, T., & Painter, K. J. (2009) · Journal of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/s00285-008-0201-3 · Cited by 1,650
3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative medicine
Vijayavenkataraman, S., Yan, W.-C., Lu, W. F., Wang, C.-H., & Fuh, J. Y. H. (2018) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.004 · Cited by 630
Nonlinear modelling of cancer: bridging the gap between cells and tumours
Lowengrub, J. S., Frieboes, H. B., Jin, F., Chuang, Y.-L., Li, X., Macklin, P., Wise, S. M., & Cristini, V (2010) · Nonlinearity · doi:10.1088/0951-7715/23/1/r01 · Cited by 553
Collective cell migration in morphogenesis and cancer
Friedl, P., Hegerfeldt, Y., & Tusch, M. (2004) · The International Journal of Developmental Biology · doi:10.1387/ijdb.041821pf · Cited by 444
Cadherin-mediated cell adhesion and tissue segregation: qualitative and quantitative determinants
Duguay, D., Foty, R. A., & Steinberg, M. S. (2003) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/s0012-1606(02)00016-7 · Cited by 388
Metadata
- Authors
- Palsson, E., & Othmer, H. G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-09-12
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 10448-10453
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2116549060
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A model for individual and collective cell movement in Dictyostelium discoideum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.97.19.10448
- The paper
- Palsson, E., & Othmer, H. G. (2000). A model for individual and collective cell movement in Dictyostelium discoideum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.19.10448
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.