The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The proton to electron stoichiometry of steady-state photosynthesis in living plants: A proton-pumping Q cycle is continuously engaged
Open accessAbstract
A noninvasive technique is introduced with which relative proton to electron stoichiometries (H + /e − ratios) for photosynthetic electron transfer can be obtained from leaves of living plants under steady-state illumination. Both electron and proton transfer fluxes were estimated by a modification of our previously reported dark-interval relaxation kinetics (DIRK) analysis, in which processes that occur upon rapid shuttering of the actinic light are analyzed. Rates of turnover of linear electron transfer through the cytochrome (cyt) b 6 f complex were estimated by measuring the DIRK signals associated with reduction of cyt f and P 700 . The rates of proton pumping through the electron transfer chain and the CF O -CF 1 ATP synthase (ATPase) were estimated by measuring the DIRK signals associated with the electrochromic shifting of pigments in the light-harvesting complexes. Electron transfer fluxes were also estimated by analysis of saturation pulse-induced changes in chlorophyll a fluorescence yield. It was shown that the H + /e − ratio, with respect to both cyt b 6 f complex and photosystem (PS) II turnover, was constant under low to saturating illumination in intact tobacco leaves. Because a H + /e − ratio of 3 at a low light is generally accepted, we infer that this ratio is maintained under conditions of normal (unstressed) photosynthesis, implying a continuously engaged, proton-pumping Q cycle at the cyt b 6 f complex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Krömer, S., & Heldt, H. W. (1991) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.95.4.1270 · Cited by 124
Cited by
Li, X.-P., Gilmore, A. M., Caffarri, S., Bassi, R., Golan, T., Kramer, D., & Niyogi, K. K. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m402461200 · Cited by 573
Self-citationThe Importance of Energy Balance in Improving Photosynthetic Productivity
Kramer, D. M., & Evans, J. R. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.110.166652 · Cited by 494
Self-citationIon antiport accelerates photosynthetic acclimation in fluctuating light environments
Armbruster, U., Carrillo, L. R., Venema, K., Pavlovic, L., Schmidtmann, E., Kornfeld, A., Jahns, P., Berry, J. A., Kramer, D. M., & Jonikas, M. C. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6439 · Cited by 259
Self-citationIn Silico Analysis of the Regulation of the Photosynthetic Electron Transport Chain in C3 Plants
Morales, A., Yin, X., Harbinson, J., Driever, S. M., Molenaar, J., Kramer, D. M., & Struik, P. C. (2018) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.17.00779 · Cited by 56
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sacksteder, C. A., Kanazawa, A., Jacoby, M. E., & Kramer, D. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-12-19
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 14283-14288
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1998127470
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The proton to electron stoichiometry of steady-state photosynthesis in living plants: A proton-pumping Q cycle is continuously engaged. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.97.26.14283
- The paper
- Sacksteder, C. A., Kanazawa, A., Jacoby, M. E., & Kramer, D. M. (2000). The proton to electron stoichiometry of steady-state photosynthesis in living plants: A proton-pumping Q cycle is continuously engaged. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.26.14283
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.