Whole-genome expression analysis of snf/swi mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Open accessAbstract
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Snf/Swi complex has been previously demonstrated to control transcription and chromatin structure of particular genes in vivo and to remodel nucleosomes in vitro . We have performed whole-genome expression analysis, using DNA microarrays, to study mutants deleted for a gene encoding one conserved (Snf2) or one unconserved (Swi1) Snf/Swi component. This analysis was performed on cells grown in both rich and minimal media. The microarray results, combined with Northern blot, computational, and genetic analyses, show that snf2 Δ and swi1 Δ mutations cause similar effects on mRNA levels, that Snf/Swi controls some genes differently in rich and minimal media, and that Snf/Swi control is exerted at the level of individual genes rather than over larger chromosomal domains. In addition, this work shows that Snf/Swi controls mRNA levels of MAT α-specific genes, likely via controlling transcription of the regulators MAT α 1 and MCM1 . Finally, we provide evidence that Snf/Swi acts both as an activator and as a repressor of transcription, and that neither mode of control is an indirect effect of the other.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SWI/SNF modulates nucleosome position to regulate the expression of a subset of genes including stress-responsive genes.
“SWI/SNF modulates nucleosome position to regulate the expression of a subset of genes including stress-responsive genes20,37–40.”
From SWI/SNF and the histone chaperone Rtt106 drive expression of the Pleiotropic Drug Resistance network genes (2022) · cites this paper as [37]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 389
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- I Herskowitz, J Rine, J Strathern Mating-Type Determination and Mating-Type Interconversion in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae, eds E W Jones, J R Pringle, J R Broach (Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press, Plainview, NY) 2, 583–656 (1992).
- Authors
- Sudarsanam, P., Iyer, V. R., Brown, P. O., & Winston, F.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-03-21
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3364-3369
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC16245
- OpenAlex
- W2062983176
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 15.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- National Institutes of Health (5r01hg000983-06)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (HG-00983)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM032967, R37GM032967, GM 32967)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Keywords
- SnF2, Swi1, transcriptional regulation, chromatin remodeling, nucleosome remodeling, gene expression profiling, MCM1, Saccharomyces cerevisiae
- MeSH terms
- Mating Factor, Acid Phosphatase, Fungal Proteins, Mutation, Peptides, RNA, Messenger, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transcription, Genetic, Blotting, Northern, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Genome, Fungal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review