Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 424

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Myoglobin: A scavenger of bioactive NO

Open access
Flögel, Ulrich, Merx, Marc W., Gödecke, Axel, Decking, Ulrich K. M., Schrader, Jürgen·2001·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The present study explored the role of myoglobin (Mb) in cardiac NO homeostasis and its functional relevance by employing isolated hearts of wild-type (WT) and myoglobin knockout mice. 1 H NMR spectroscopy was used to measure directly the conversion of oxygenated Mb (MbO 2 ) to metmyoglobin (metMb) by reaction with NO. NO was applied intracoronarily (5 nM to 25 μM), or its endogenous production was stimulated with bradykinin (Bk; 10 nM to 2 μM). We found that infusion of authentic NO solutions dose-dependently (≥ 2.5 μM NO) increased metMb formation in WT hearts that was rapidly reversible on cessation of NO infusion. Likewise, Bk-induced release of NO was associated with significant metMb formation in the WT (≥1 μM Bk). Hearts lacking Mb reacted more sensitively to infused NO in that vasodilatation and the cardiodepressant actions of NO were more pronounced. Similar results were obtained with Bk. The lower sensitivity of WT hearts to changes in NO concentration fits well with the hypothesis that in the presence of Mb, a continuous degradation of NO takes place by reaction of MbO 2 + NO to metMb + NO 3 − , thereby effectively reducing cytosolic NO concentration. This breakdown protects myocytic cytochromes against transient rises in cytosolic NO. Regeneration of metMb by metMb reductase to Mb and subsequent association with O 2 leads to reformation of MbO 2 available for another NO degradation cycle. Our data indicate that this cycle is crucial in the breakdown of NO and substantially determines the dose–response curve of the NO effects on coronary blood flow and cardiac contractility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.98.2.735

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 424

Metadata

Authors
Flögel, U., Merx, M. W., Gödecke, A., Decking, U. K. M., & Schrader, J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2001-01-02
Volume
98
Issue
2
Pages
735-740
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2037967237
Cited by
424
References
5
FWCI
11.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Myoglobin: A scavenger of bioactive NO. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.98.2.735
The paper
Flögel, U., Merx, M. W., Gödecke, A., Decking, U. K. M., & Schrader, J. (2001). Myoglobin: A scavenger of bioactive NO. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.735

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.