The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Carboxyl-terminal Splicing of the Rat μ Opioid Receptor Modulates Agonist-mediated Internalization and Receptor Resensitization
Open accessAbstract
The rat mu opioid receptor is alternatively spliced into two isoforms (MOR1 and MOR1B) which differ in length and amino acid composition at the carboxyl terminus. When stably expressed in HEK 293 cells, both splice variants bind the mu receptor agonist [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,-Gly-ol5]enkephalin (DAMGO) with similar affinity and exhibit functional coupling to adenylyl cyclase with similar efficiency. However, the shorter isoform, MOR1B, desensitized at a slower rate during prolonged DAMGO exposure (4 h) but resensitized at a faster rate than MOR1 during agonist withdrawal (20 min). Immunocytochemical analysis revealed that DAMGO-induced internalization of MOR1B proceeded much faster than that of MOR1 followed by rapid recycling of the receptor to the cell surface. In addition, the greater resistance of MOR1B to homologous desensitization compared with MOR1 as well as MOR1B resensitization was abolished when receptor reactivation/recycling was blocked with monensin, an inhibitor of endosomal acidification. It is concluded that the sequence at the cytoplasmic tail of MOR1B facilitates clathrin-coated vesicle-mediated endocytosis which, in turn, promotes accelerated receptor reactivation. Taken together, our findings suggest that carboxyl-terminal splicing of the rat mu opioid receptor modulates agonist-induced internalization and receptor resensitization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cellular and Synaptic Adaptations Mediating Opioid Dependence
Williams, J. T., Christie, M. J., & Manzoni, O. (2001) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2001.81.1.299 · Cited by 848
Regulation of μ-opioid receptors: desensitization, phosphorylation, internalization, and tolerance
Williams, J. T., Ingram, S. L., Henderson, G., Chavkin, C., von Zastrow, M., Schulz, S., Koch, T., Evans, C. J., & Christie, M. J. (2013) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.112.005942 · Cited by 802
Self-citationWaldhoer, M., Bartlett, S. E., & Whistler, J. L. (2004) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073940 · Cited by 740
Mu Opioids and Their Receptors: Evolution of a Concept
Pasternak, G. W., & Pan, Y.-X. (2013) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.112.007138 · Cited by 578
Beyer, A., Koch, T., Schröder, H., Schulz, S., & Höllt, V. (2004) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02340.x · Cited by 258
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Koch, T., Schulz, S., Schro¨der, H., Wolf, R., Raulf, E., & Ho¨llt, V.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 273
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 13652-13657
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064734596
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carboxyl-terminal Splicing of the Rat μ Opioid Receptor Modulates Agonist-mediated Internalization and Receptor Resensitization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.273.22.13652
- The paper
- Koch, T., Schulz, S., Schro¨der, H., Wolf, R., Raulf, E., & Ho¨llt, V. (1998). Carboxyl-terminal Splicing of the Rat μ Opioid Receptor Modulates Agonist-mediated Internalization and Receptor Resensitization. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.22.13652
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.