The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of the A118G polymorphism on binding affinity, potency and agonist‐mediated endocytosis, desensitization, and resensitization of the human mu‐opioid receptor
Abstract
The most prevalent single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) A118G in the human µ‐opioid receptor gene predicts an amino acid change from an asparagine residue to an aspartatic residue in amino acid position 40. This N40D mutation, which has been implicated in the development of opioid addiction, was previously reported to result in an increased β‐endorphin binding affinity and a decreased potency of morphine‐6‐glucuronide. Therefore, in the present study we have investigated whether this mutation might affect the binding affinity, potency, and/or the agonist‐induced desensitization, internalization and resensitization of the human µ‐opioid receptor stably expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. With the exception of a reduced expression level of N40D compared to human µ‐opioid receptor (hMOR) in HEK293 cells, our analyses revealed no marked functional differences between N40D and wild‐type receptor. Morphine, morphine‐6‐glucuronide and β‐endorphin revealed similar binding affinities and potencies for both receptors. Both the N40D‐variant receptor and hMOR exhibited robust receptor internalization in the presence of the opioid peptide [d‐Ala 2,N‐MePhe 4,Glyol 5]enkephalin (DAMGO) and β‐endorphin but not in response to morphine or morphine‐6‐glucuronide. After prolonged treatment with morphine, morphine‐6‐glucuronide or β‐endorphin both receptors showed similiar desensitization time courses. In addition, the receptor resensitization rates were nearly identical for both receptor types.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Regulation of μ-opioid receptors: desensitization, phosphorylation, internalization, and tolerance
Williams, J. T., Ingram, S. L., Henderson, G., Chavkin, C., von Zastrow, M., Schulz, S., Koch, T., Evans, C. J., & Christie, M. J. (2013) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.112.005942 · Cited by 802
Self-citationAllelic Expression Imbalance of Human mu Opioid Receptor (OPRM1) Caused by Variant A118G
Zhang, Y., Wang, D., Johnson, A. D., Papp, A. C., & Sadée, W. (2005) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m504942200 · Cited by 563
Anton, R. F., Oroszi, G., O’Malley, S., Couper, D., Swift, R., Pettinati, H., & Goldman, D. (2008) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.65.2.135 · Cited by 451
The comorbidity of insomnia, chronic pain, and depression: Dopamine as a putative mechanism
Finan, P. H., & Smith, M. T. (2013) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2012.03.003 · Cited by 363
Chou, W. ‐., Yang, L. ‐., Lu, H. ‐., Ko, J. ‐., Wang, C. ‐., Lin, S. ‐., Lee, T. ‐., Concejero, A., & Hsu, C. ‐. (2006) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01058.x · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Beyer, A., Koch, T., Schröder, H., Schulz, S., & Höllt, V.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-03-22
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 553-560
- ISSN
- 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-4159
- OpenAlex
- W1989309280
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of the A118G polymorphism on binding affinity, potency and agonist‐mediated endocytosis, desensitization, and resensitization of the human mu‐opioid receptor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02340.x
- The paper
- Beyer, A., Koch, T., Schröder, H., Schulz, S., & Höllt, V. (2004). Effect of the A118G polymorphism on binding affinity, potency and agonist‐mediated endocytosis, desensitization, and resensitization of the human mu‐opioid receptor. Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02340.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.