The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Monoterpene Synthases from Common Sage (Salvia officinalis )
Open accessAbstract
Common sage (Salvia officinalis) produces an extremely broad range of cyclic monoterpenes bearing diverse carbon skeletons, including members of the p-menthane (1,8-cineole), pinane (alpha- and beta-pinene), thujane (isothujone), camphane (camphene), and bornane (camphor) families. An homology-based polymerase chain reaction cloning strategy was developed and used to isolate the cDNAs encoding three multiproduct monoterpene synthases from this species that were functionally expressed in Escherichia coli. The heterologously expressed synthases produce (+)-bornyl diphosphate, 1, 8-cineole, and (+)-sabinene, respectively, as their major products from geranyl diphosphate. The bornyl diphosphate synthase also produces significant amounts of (+)-alpha-pinene, (+)-camphene, and (+/-)-limonene. The 1,8-cineole synthase produces significant amounts of (+)- and (-)-alpha-pinene, (+)- and (-)-beta-pinene, myrcene and (+)-sabinene, and the (+)-sabinene synthase produces significant quantities of gamma-terpinene and terpinolene. All three enzymes appear to be translated as preproteins bearing an amino-terminal plastid targeting sequence, consistent with the plastidial origin of monoterpenes in plants. Deduced sequence analysis and size exclusion chromatography indicate that the recombinant bornyl diphosphate synthase is a homodimer, whereas the other two recombinant enzymes are monomeric, consistent with the size and subunit architecture of their native enzyme counterparts. The distribution and stereochemistry of the products generated by the recombinant (+)-bornyl diphosphate synthase suggest that this enzyme might represent both (+)-bornyl diphosphate synthase and (+)-pinene synthase which were previously assumed to be distinct enzymes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Structural Biology and Chemistry of the Terpenoid Cyclases
Christianson, D. W. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050286w · Cited by 788
Terpenoid Metabolism in Wild-Type and Transgenic Arabidopsis Plants[W]
Aharoni, A., Giri, A. P., Deuerlein, S., Griepink, F., de Kogel, W.-J., Verstappen, F. W. A., Verhoeven, H. A., Jongsma, M. A., Schwab, W., & Bouwmeester, H. J. (2003) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.016253 · Cited by 543
Enantiomeric Natural Products: Occurrence and Biogenesis
Finefield, J. M., Sherman, D. H., Kreitman, M., & Williams, R. M. (2012) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201107204 · Cited by 299
Enzymatic Chemistry of Cyclopropane, Epoxide, and Aziridine Biosynthesis
Thibodeaux, C. J., Chang, W.-C., & Liu, H.-W. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200073d · Cited by 275
The Gene Controlling Marijuana Psychoactivity
Sirikantaramas, S., Morimoto, S., Shoyama, Y., Ishikawa, Y., Wada, Y., Shoyama, Y., & Taura, F. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m403693200 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Wise, M. L., Savage, T. J., Katahira, E., & Croteau, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 273
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 14891-14899
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4240971598
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monoterpene Synthases from Common Sage (Salvia officinalis ). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.273.24.14891
- The paper
- Wise, M. L., Savage, T. J., Katahira, E., & Croteau, R. (1998). Monoterpene Synthases from Common Sage (Salvia officinalis ). Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.24.14891
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.