The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential Effects of PAK1-activating Mutations Reveal Activity-dependent and -independent Effects on Cytoskeletal Regulation
Open accessAbstract
PAKs are serine/threonine protein kinases that are activated by binding to Rac or Cdc42hs. Different forms of activated PAK1 have been reported to either promote membrane ruffling and focal adhesion assembly or cause focal adhesion disassembly and stress fiber dissolution. To understand the basis for these distinct morphological effects, we have examined the mechanism of mutational activation of PAK1, and characterized the effects of different active PAK1 proteins on cytoskeletal structure in vivo. We find that PAK1 contains an autoinhibitory domain that overlaps with its small G protein binding domain and that two separate activating mutations within this regulatory region each decrease autoinhibitory activity. Because only one of these mutations affects Cdc42hs binding activity, this indicates that activation of PAK1 by these mutations results from interference with the function of the autoinhibitory domain and not with small G protein binding activity. When we examined the morphological effects of these different forms of PAK1 in vivo, we found that PAK1 kinase activity was associated with disassembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers and that this may require interaction with potential SH3 domain-containing proteins. Lamellipodia formation and membrane ruffling caused by active PAK1 expression, however, was independent of PAK1 catalytic activity and likely requires interaction among multiple proteins binding to the PAK1 regulatory domain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Formation of actin stress fibers and focal adhesions enhanced by Rho-kinase
Amano, M., Chihara, K., Kimura, K., Fukata, Y., Nakamura, N., Matsuura, Y., & Kaibuchi, K. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5304.1308 · Cited by 1,077
Cited by
Rho GTPases and their effector proteins
BISHOP, A. L., & HALL, A. (2000) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj3480241 · Cited by 2,575
Alberts, A. S. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m006205200 · Cited by 329
Requirement for PAK4 in the Anchorage-independent Growth of Human Cancer Cell Lines
Callow, M. G., Clairvoyant, F., Zhu, S., Schryver, B., Whyte, D. B., Bischoff, J. R., Jallal, B., & Smeal, T. (2002) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m105732200 · Cited by 288
Hayashi, M. L., Choi, S.-Y., Rao, B. S. S., Jung, H.-Y., Lee, H.-K., Zhang, D., Chattarji, S., Kirkwood, A., & Tonegawa, S. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.05.003 · Cited by 280
Pak protein kinases and their role in cancer
Dummler, B., Ohshiro, K., Kumar, R., & Field, J. (2009) · Cancer and Metastasis Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10555-008-9168-1 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Frost, J. A., Khokhlatchev, A., Stippec, S., White, M. A., & Cobb, M. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 273
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- 28191-28198
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026469331
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential Effects of PAK1-activating Mutations Reveal Activity-dependent and -independent Effects on Cytoskeletal Regulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.273.43.28191
- The paper
- Frost, J. A., Khokhlatchev, A., Stippec, S., White, M. A., & Cobb, M. H. (1998). Differential Effects of PAK1-activating Mutations Reveal Activity-dependent and -independent Effects on Cytoskeletal Regulation. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.43.28191
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.