The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Loss of N-Glycolylneuraminic Acid in Human Evolution
Open accessAbstract
The common sialic acids of mammalian cells are N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) and N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc). Humans are an exception, because of a mutation in CMP-sialic acid hydroxylase, which occurred after our common ancestor with great apes. We asked if the resulting loss of Neu5Gc and increase in Neu5Ac in humans alters the biology of the siglecs, which are Ig superfamily members that recognize sialic acids. Human siglec-1 (sialoadhesin) strongly prefers Neu5Ac over Neu5Gc. Thus, humans have a higher density of siglec-1 ligands than great apes. Siglec-1-positive macrophages in humans are found primarily in the perifollicular zone, whereas in chimpanzees they also occur in the marginal zone and surrounding the periarteriolar lymphocyte sheaths. Although only a subset of chimpanzee macrophages express siglec-1, most human macrophages are positive. A known evolutionary difference is the strong preference of mouse siglec-2 (CD22) for Neu5Gc, contrasting with human siglec-2, which binds Neu5Ac equally well. To ask when the preference for Neu5Gc was adjusted in the human lineage, we cloned the first three extracellular domains of siglec-2 from all of the great apes and examined their preference. In fact, siglec-2 had evolved a higher degree of recognition flexibility before Neu5Gc was lost in humans. Human siglec-3 (CD33) and siglec-6 (obesity-binding protein 1) also recognize both Neu5Ac and Neu5Gc, and siglec-5 may have some preference for Neu5Gc. Others showed that siglec-4a (myelin-associated glycoprotein) prefers Neu5Ac over Neu5Gc. Thus, the human loss of Neu5Gc may alter biological processes involving siglec-1, and possibly, siglec-4a or -5.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
King, M.-C., & Wilson, A. C. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1090005 · Cited by 2,815
Selectins and their ligands: Current concepts and controversies
Kansas, G. (1996) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v88.9.3259.bloodjournal8893259 · Cited by 1,415
Cited by
Glycan-based interactions involving vertebrate sialic-acid-recognizing proteins
Varki, A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05816 · Cited by 853
Self-citationChou, H.-H., Hayakawa, T., Diaz, S., Krings, M., Indriati, E., Leakey, M., Paabo, S., Satta, Y., Takahata, N., & Varki, A. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.182257399 · Cited by 349
Self-citationGhaderi, D., Zhang, M., Hurtado-Ziola, N., & Varki, A. (2012) · Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews · doi:10.5661/bger-28-147 · Cited by 320
Self-citationOligosaccharides of milk and colostrum in non-human mammals
Urashima, T., Saito, T., Nakamura, T., & Messer, M. (2001) · Glycoconjugate Journal · doi:10.1023/a:1014881913541 · Cited by 280
Zhang, J. Q., Nicoll, G., Jones, C., & Crocker, P. R. (2000) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m002788200 · Cited by 229
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Brinkman-Van der Linden, E. C. M., Sjoberg, E. R., Juneja, L. R., Crocker, P. R., Varki, N., & Varki, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 275
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 8633-8640
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1537754319
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Loss of N-Glycolylneuraminic Acid in Human Evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.275.12.8633
- The paper
- Brinkman-Van der Linden, E. C. M., Sjoberg, E. R., Juneja, L. R., Crocker, P. R., Varki, N., & Varki, A. (2000). Loss of N-Glycolylneuraminic Acid in Human Evolution. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.12.8633
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.