Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Carbon Dioxide Permeability of Aquaporin-1 Measured in Erythrocytes and Lung of Aquaporin-1 Null Mice and in Reconstituted Proteoliposomes

Open access
Yang, Baoxue, Fukuda, Norimasa, van Hoek, Alfred, Matthay, Michael A., Ma, Tonghui, Verkman, A.S.·2000·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Measurements of CO(2) permeability in oocytes and liposomes containing water channel aquaporin-1 (AQP1) have suggested that AQP1 is able to transport both water and CO(2). We studied the physiological consequences of CO(2) transport by AQP1 by comparing CO(2) permeabilities in erythrocytes and intact lung of wild-type and AQP1 null mice. Erythrocytes from wild-type mice strongly expressed AQP1 protein and had 7-fold greater osmotic water permeability than did erythrocytes from null mice. CO(2) permeability was measured from the rate of intracellular acidification in response to addition of CO(2)/HCO(3)(-) in a stopped-flow fluorometer using 2',7'-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)-5-(and -6)-carboxyfluorescein (BCECF) as a cytoplasmic pH indicator. In erythrocytes from wild-type mice, acidification was rapid (t((1)/(2)), 7.3 +/- 0.4 ms, S.E., n = 11 mice) and blocked by acetazolamide and increasing external pH (to decrease CO(2)/HCO(3)(-) ratio). Apparent CO(2) permeability (P(CO(2))) was not different in erythrocytes from wild-type (0.012 +/- 0.0008 cm/s) versus null (0.011 +/- 0.001 cm/s) mice. Lung CO(2) transport was measured in anesthetized, ventilated mice subjected to a decrease in inspired CO(2) content from 5% to 0%, producing an average decrease in arterial blood pCO(2) from 77 +/- 4 to 39 +/- 3 mm Hg (14 mice) with a t((1)/(2)) of 1.4 min. The pCO(2) values and kinetics of decreasing pCO(2) were not different in wild-type versus null mice. Because AQP1 deletion did not affect CO(2) transport in erythrocytes and lung, we re-examined CO(2) permeability in AQP1-reconstituted liposomes containing carbonic anhydrase (CA) and a fluorescent pH indicator. Whereas osmotic water permeability in AQP1-reconstituted liposomes was >100-fold greater than that in control liposomes, apparent P(CO(2)) (approximately 10(-3) cm/s) did not differ. Measurements using different CA concentrations and HgCl(2) indicated that liposome P(CO(2)) is unstirred layer-limited and that HgCl(2) slows acidification because of inhibition of CA rather than AQP1. These results provide direct evidence against physiologically significant AQP1-mediated CO(2) transport and establish an upper limit to the CO(2) permeability through single AQP1 water channels.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.275.4.2686

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Yang, B., Fukuda, N., van Hoek, A., Matthay, M. A., Ma, T., & Verkman, A. S.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-01
Volume
275
Issue
4
Pages
2686-2692
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964474152
Cited by
181
References
0
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon Dioxide Permeability of Aquaporin-1 Measured in Erythrocytes and Lung of Aquaporin-1 Null Mice and in Reconstituted Proteoliposomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.275.4.2686
The paper
Yang, B., Fukuda, N., van Hoek, A., Matthay, M. A., Ma, T., & Verkman, A. S. (2000). Carbon Dioxide Permeability of Aquaporin-1 Measured in Erythrocytes and Lung of Aquaporin-1 Null Mice and in Reconstituted Proteoliposomes. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.4.2686

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.