The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ligand-, Cell-, and Estrogen Receptor Subtype (α/β)-dependent Activation at GC-rich (Sp1) Promoter Elements
Open accessAbstract
17beta-Estradiol (E2) induces expression of several genes via estrogen receptor (ER)-Sp1 protein interactions with GC-rich promoter elements in which Sp1 but not ER binds DNA. This study reports the ligand- and cell context-dependent ER(alpha)/Sp1 and ER(beta)/Sp1 action using an E2-responsive construct (pSp1) containing a GC-rich promoter. Both ER(alpha) and ER(beta) proteins physically interact with Sp1 (coimmunoprecipitation) and preferentially bind to the C-terminal region of this protein in pull-down assays. E2- and antiestrogen-dependent transcriptional activation of ER(alpha)/Sp1 was observed in MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and LnCaP cells, but not in HeLa cells. E2 did not affect or significantly decrease ER(beta)/Sp1 action, and antiestrogens had minimal effects in the same 4 cell lines. Exchange of activation function-1 (AF-1) domains of ER subtypes gave chimeric ER(alpha/beta) (AF-1alpha/AF-2beta) and ER(beta/alpha) (AF-1beta/AF-2alpha) proteins that resembled wild-type ER (alpha or beta) in terms of physical association with Sp1 protein. Transcriptional activation studies with chimeric ER(beta/alpha) and ER(alpha/beta) showed that only ER(alpha/beta) can activate transcription from an Sp1 element, not ER(beta/alpha). This indicates that the AF-1 domain from ER(alpha) is responsible for activation at an Sp1 element, independent of ER subtype context. In order to further characterize this observation, deletion constructs in the AF-1 domain of both ER(alpha) and ER(alpha/beta) were made, and transactivation studies indicated that the region between amino acids 79 and 117 of this domain is important for activation at an Sp1 element.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The nuclear receptor superfamily: the second decade
Mangelsdorf, D. J., Thummel, C., Beato, M., Herrlich, P., Schütz, G., Umesono, K., Blumberg, B., Kastner, P., Mark, M., Chambon, P., et al. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90199-x · Cited by 6,964
Cited by
Estrogen receptors: how do they signal and what are their targets
Heldring, N., Pike, A., Andersson, S., Matthews, J., Cheng, G., Hartman, J., Tujague, M., Ström, A., Treuter, E., Warner, M., et al. (2007) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00026.2006 · Cited by 1,857
Self-citationDupont, S., Krust, A., Gansmuller, A., Dierich, A., Chambon, P., & Mark, M. (2000) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.127.19.4277 · Cited by 1,064
Molecular biology of the 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/Δ5-Δ4 –isomerase gene family
Simard, J., Ricketts, M.-L., Gingras, S., Soucy, P., Feltus, F. A., & Melner, M. H. (2005) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2002-0050 · Cited by 620
Shanle, E. K., & Xu, W. (2011) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx100231n · Cited by 522
Molecular mechanism of estrogen–estrogen receptor signaling
Yaşar, P., Ayaz, G., User, S. D., Güpür, G., & Muyan, M. (2017) · Reproductive Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1002/rmb2.12006 · Cited by 482
Metadata
- Authors
- Saville, B., Wormke, M., Wang, F., Nguyen, T., Enmark, E., Kuiper, G., Gustafsson, J.-Å., & Safe, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 275
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 5379-5387
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037330610
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ligand-, Cell-, and Estrogen Receptor Subtype (α/β)-dependent Activation at GC-rich (Sp1) Promoter Elements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.275.8.5379
- The paper
- Saville, B., Wormke, M., Wang, F., Nguyen, T., Enmark, E., Kuiper, G., Gustafsson, J.-Å., & Safe, S. (2000). Ligand-, Cell-, and Estrogen Receptor Subtype (α/β)-dependent Activation at GC-rich (Sp1) Promoter Elements. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.8.5379
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.