Cited by 37DNA Repair MechanismsFungal and yeast genetics researchGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Replication Factor C Is a More Effective Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA) Opener than the Checkpoint Clamp Loader, Rad24-RFC

Open access
Thompson, Jennifer A., Marzahn, Melissa R., O'Donnell, Mike, Bloom, Linda B.·2012·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Clamp loaders from all domains of life load clamps onto DNA. The clamp tethers DNA polymerases to DNA to increase the processivity of synthesis as well as the efficiency of replication. Here, we investigated proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) binding and opening by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae clamp loader, replication factor C (RFC), and the DNA damage checkpoint clamp loader, Rad24-RFC, using two separate fluorescence intensity-based assays. Analysis of PCNA opening by RFC revealed a two-step reaction in which RFC binds PCNA before opening PCNA rather than capturing clamps that have transiently and spontaneously opened in solution. The affinity of RFC for PCNA is about an order of magnitude lower in the absence of ATP than in its presence. The affinity of Rad24-RFC for PCNA in the presence of ATP is about an order magnitude weaker than that of RFC for PCNA, similar to the RFC-PCNA interaction in the absence of ATP. Importantly, fewer open clamp loader-clamp complexes are formed when PCNA is bound by Rad24-RFC than when bound by RFC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.c111.318899

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thompson, J. A., Marzahn, M. R., O'Donnell, M., & Bloom, L. B.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Bloom, Linda B.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
287
Issue
3
Pages
2203-2209
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970916666
Cited by
37
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM082849, GM082849, R37GM038839, R01GM038839, GM038839)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
replication factor C, PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, clamp loader, DNA damage checkpoint, clamp loading, DNA polymerase processivity, ATP-dependent binding, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, DNA replication
MeSH terms
Protein Binding, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cell Cycle Proteins, Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen, Multiprotein Complexes, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Cell Proliferation, Replication Protein C

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review