Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 305

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Strength of the CαH··O Hydrogen Bond of Amino Acid Residues

Open access
Scheiner, Steve, Kar, Tapas, Gu, Yanliang·2001·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Although the peptide C(alpha)H group has historically not been thought to form hydrogen bonds within proteins, ab initio quantum calculations show it to be a potent proton donor. Its binding energy to a water molecule lies in the range between 1.9 and 2.5 kcal/mol for nonpolar and polar amino acids; the hydrogen bond (H-bond) involving the charged lysine residue is even stronger than a conventional OH..O interaction. The preferred H-bond lengths are quite uniform, about 3.32 A. Formation of each interaction results in a downfield shift of the bridging hydrogen's chemical shift and a blue shift in the C(alpha)H stretching frequency, potential diagnostics of the presence of such an H-bond within a protein.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m010770200

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 305

Metadata

Authors
Scheiner, S., Kar, T., & Gu, Y.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-03
Volume
276
Issue
13
Pages
9832-9837
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1551351981
Cited by
305
References
0
FWCI
15.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strength of the CαH··O Hydrogen Bond of Amino Acid Residues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m010770200
The paper
Scheiner, S., Kar, T., & Gu, Y. (2001). Strength of the CαH··O Hydrogen Bond of Amino Acid Residues. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m010770200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.