Cited by 32Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerSignaling Pathways in DiseaseProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

TAB2 Scaffolds TAK1 and NLK in Repressing Canonical Wnt Signaling

Open access
Li, Meng, Wang, He, Huang, Tao, Wang, Jiyong, Ding, Yu, Li, Zhenfei, Zhang, Jinkuo, Li, Lin·2010·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The TAK1-NLK cascade is a mitogen-activated protein kinase-related pathway that plays an inhibitory role in canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signaling through regulating the LEF1/TCF family transcriptional factors. TAB2 (TAK1-binding protein 2) is a putative TAK1 interacting protein that is involved in the regulation of TAK1. Here, we found that TAB2 could directly interact with NLK and function as a scaffold protein to facilitate the interaction between TAK1 and NLK. Knocking down TAB2 using small interfering RNA abolished the interaction of TAK1 with NLK in mammalian cells. The intermediate region (residues 292-417) of TAB2 was mapped for its binding to NLK. TAB2-DeltaM, a TAB2 mutant lacking this region, showed a lower affinity for NLK and became defective in its scaffolding function. In addition, TAB2, but not TAB2-DeltaM, mediated TAK1-dependent activation of NLK and LEF1 polyubiquitylation, resulting in the inhibition of canonical Wnt signaling. Moreover, Wnt3a stimulation led to an increase in the interaction of TAB2 with NLK and the formation of a TAK1.TAB2.NLK complex, suggesting that this TAK1-TAB2-NLK pathway may constitute a negative feedback mechanism for canonical Wnt signaling.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m109.083246

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another mechanism of antagonising Wnt/β-catenin signalling by NLK is through activation of the TAK1-mediated non-canonical Wnt pathway and TAB2.

    “Another mechanism of antagonising the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway by NLK is through activation of the transforming growth factor beta-activated kinase 1 (TAK1)-mediated non-canonical Wnt pathway and TAK1-binding protein 2 (TAB2).”

    From Nemo-Like Kinase in Development and Diseases: Insights from Mouse Studies (2020) · cites this paper as [18]

    The paper reports that TAB2 scaffolds TAK1 and NLK, enabling NLK activation and inhibition of canonical Wnt signaling (opening summary; Results and Discussion). It does not establish this as activation of a specifically non-canonical Wnt pathway: its experiments use Wnt3a stimulation, and it describes the resulting cascade as possible negative feedback on canonical signaling. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • TAB2 can directly interact with NLK as a scaffold protein, thereby enabling the interaction between NLK and TAK1.

    “It was shown that TAB2 can directly interact with NLK as a scaffold protein, thereby enabling the interaction between NLK and TAK1 [18].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]5. Kojima, H., Sasaki, T., Ishitani, T., Iemura, S., Zhao, H., Kaneko, S., Kunimoto, H., Natsume, T., Matsumoto, K., and Nakajima, K. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 4524-4529
  2. [9]9. Brott, B. K., Pinsky, B. A., and Erikson, R. L. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 963-968

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, M., Wang, H., Huang, T., Wang, J., Ding, Y., Li, Z., Zhang, J., & Li, L.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Lin
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
285
Issue
18
Pages
13397-13404
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997989974
Cited by
32
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Signaling Pathways in Disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
TAB2, TAK1, Nemo-like kinase, canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway, scaffold proteins, protein-protein interaction, negative feedback regulation, Wnt3a
MeSH terms
MAP Kinase Kinase Kinase 7, Animals, Cell Line, Humans, Mutation, Signal Transduction, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, MAP Kinase Kinase Kinases, Multiprotein Complexes, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Wnt Proteins, beta Catenin, Mice, Gene Knockdown Techniques, Wnt3 Protein, Wnt3A Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review