Cited by 25Cellular transport and secretionProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Crystal Structures of Human TBC1D1 and TBC1D4 (AS160) RabGTPase-activating Protein (RabGAP) Domains Reveal Critical Elements for GLUT4 Translocation

Open access
Park, Sang-Youn, Jin, Wanzhu, Woo, Ju Rang, Shoelson, Steven E.·2011·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

We have solved the x-ray crystal structures of the RabGAP domains of human TBC1D1 and human TBC1D4 (AS160), at 2.2 and 3.5 Å resolution, respectively. Like the yeast Gyp1p RabGAP domain, whose structure was solved previously in complex with mouse Rab33B, the human TBC1D1 and TBC1D4 domains both have 16 α-helices and no β-sheet elements. We expected the yeast Gyp1p RabGAP/mouse Rab33B structure to predict the corresponding interfaces between cognate mammalian RabGAPs and Rabs, but found that residues were poorly conserved. We further tested the relevance of this model by Ala-scanning mutagenesis, but only one of five substitutions within the inferred binding site of the TBC1D1 RabGAP significantly perturbed catalytic efficiency. In addition, substitution of TBC1D1 residues with corresponding residues from Gyp1p did not enhance catalytic efficiency. We hypothesized that biologically relevant RabGAP/Rab partners utilize additional contacts not described in the yeast Gyp1p/mouse Rab33B structure, which we predicted using our two new human TBC1D1 and TBC1D4 structures. Ala substitution of TBC1D1 Met(930), corresponding to a residue outside of the Gyp1p/Rab33B contact, substantially reduced catalytic activity. GLUT4 translocation assays confirmed the biological relevance of our findings. Substitutions with lowest RabGAP activity, including catalytically dead RK and Met(930) and Leu(1019) predicted to perturb Rab binding, confirmed that biological activity requires contacts between cognate RabGAPs and Rabs beyond those in the yeast Gyp1p RabGAP/mouse Rab33B structure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m110.217323

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The TBC1D7 apo structure reveals an architecture highly conserved with other TBC domain proteins, with little conformational difference in comparison to the TSC1-complexed structures.

    “The apo structure (Fig. 5D) reveals an architecture highly conserved with other TBC domain proteins (Fischer et al., 2016; Fukuda, 2011; Park et al., 2011), with little conformational difference in comparison to the TSC1-complexed structures.”

    From Signal integration in the (m)TORC1 growth pathway (2018) · cites this paper as Park et al., 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sano, H., Eguez, L., Teruel, M. N., Fukuda, M., Chuang, T. D., Chavez, J. A., Lienhard, G. E., and McGraw, T. E. (2007) Cell Metab. 5, 293-303
  2. Dash, S., Sano, H., Rochford, J. J., Semple, R. K., Yeo, G., Hyden, C. S., Soos, M. A., Clark, J., Rodin, A., Langenberg, C., Druet, C., Fawcett, K. A., Tung, Y. C., Wareham, N. J., Barroso, I., Lienhard, G. E., O'Rahilly, S., and Savage, D. B. (2009) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 9350 -9355

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, S.-Y., Jin, W., Woo, J. R., & Shoelson, S. E.
Affiliations
Joslin Diabetes Center (US)
Corresponding author
Shoelson, Steven E.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
286
Issue
20
Pages
18130-18138
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010974202
Cited by
25
References
22
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DEAC-02-98CH10886, -AC02-98 CH 10886, DE-AC02-)
  • Joslin Diabetes Center (P30DK36836)
  • National Institutes of Health (DE-AC02-98CH10886, P30 DK36836, R01 DK51729, DK 36836)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01 DK 43123, R01-DK-51729, R01DK051729, P30-DK36836, F32 DK77485, R01DK043123, F32DK077485, P30DK036836)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (P30EB009998)
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory (AC-02-98CH10886, DE-AC02- 98CH10886)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
TBC1D1, TBC1D4, AS160, Rab GTPase-activating protein, GLUT4 translocation, RAB33B, catalytic efficiency, alpha-helical domain, skeletal muscle glucose transport
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Models, Molecular, Structure-Activity Relationship, Protein Structure, Secondary, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Crystallography, X-Ray, GTPase-Activating Proteins, rab GTP-Binding Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Glucose Transporter Type 4, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review